You being the mouthpiece of Laf telling everyone that will listen that you feel 'torted' and should be compensated.Agreed, but do you want to discuss your members making sure they are MUCH better after reps then before?
Remember these are Reps,not retals..if you want me to post reps owed and what your members are considering fair reps for 500 acres lost, i can.
500 acres lost...2500 acres $90mil + 25k tech per PS?
Good God..no wonder you all get sue ee side on

LaF always go for the mega-reps =/ always take the retals or you'll be paying forever ! :)

What do you expect from La Famiglia? Hugs and kisses?

Meh it doesn't matter not like I am going to have a good finish anyways (NW wise)... I take land from NA then LaF takes it from me... What a perfect little circle :p

Was it necessary to open ANOTHER Thread on the same issue that a dozen other threads are on?!

I'm confident that TAN and Para have worked out a solution that is mutually acceptable to both sides....

if you're not happy with it, that's something you should take up with TAN rather than opening a new thread and trying to flame me; compounding an issue that has been resolved, to my knowledge...

I was not at all involved in the negotiations, I was really only concerned with making PDM realize the gravity of the situation, since the impression I got from PDM was that it was a non-issue & something that was LaF's responsibility to deal with.

I guarantee you that LaF as a whole loses out on this. The lost stock+land and the cost to kill the suicider (both the actual cost of the military units and opportunity cost of the turns used) is far more than LaF will be paid back.

Still feel like flaming?

You guys should just refuse to pay them and war LaF next set.

fluff LaF.

thatguy,

I don't know how long you were in PDM before deciding to ruin a set and then some for your entire alliance, but it's not long since LaF and PDM warred over something along the same lines.

I don't think either side wants that again.

It's just like suicide IRL... The ones you hurt most are those that are closest to you...

thatguy, you're an idiot, a real one. Selfish like very few. You've put your 'friends' in pdm in a bad situation because you're an *sshole.

of course if you aren't happy with it you can always AB fs laf:P

I want to war mach... :(

prefferably someone better than pdm, but war none the less

PDM you saving turns yet?

laf would destroy pdm in war, obviously. no one is going to try to dispute that. so at this point of laf's fluffery, the question is less does pdm want to open that can of worms, and more does laf want to have to war pdm every set that they want to net?

@Walding:

No, we're using all our turns to farm you. lawlz

Idiocy and selfishness/apathy are different things revolver.

I just figure PDM should fight a losing war rather than be LaF landfluffes.

thatguy, YOU are the one who made us pick between those two choices.

It's easy for you to tell us what action we should take now that you can look back and laugh at your handiwork.

Yup

Jesus motherfluffing christ thatguy I dont believe you still have the cheek to post here, you've already made other PDMers pay for your actions and you still want to tell US what to do?

This is a server wide forum Strife, I'm still posting because I'm interested in how the consequences of my actions are unfolding. And it's not as if I was issuing any kind of mandate, but the way I see it, PDM was on the brink of disbanding whether I took that course of action or not. Why not spend possibly your last set fighting instead of running landfarms for fluffheads.

because we WEREN'T going to disband after peep's saw llaar's wardec. it would have been too fortuitous to disband after seeing something like that.

but now with the latest fluffstorm, we are considering disbanding again. cheers.

Yes, but llaar's war dec didn't make the conditions that led to us talking about disbanding in the first place disappear. It wouldn't be long, probably only a set, until the issue was brought up again.

does NA need to declare war on PDM again then? =P

come on you guys, you've been through worse, i was there during the RD wars

i don't want to see any more clans disappear from this game

no leaving!

*shakes fist*

Even during the RD days the political climate was a lot better.

thatguy, without you, PDM would be in much better situation. So, your actions are definitely not apathic but selfish. You decided yourself of how things should be for PDM when you decided on what you were about to do. By seeing the open-mindness of TAN, it is clear that PDM leadership didn't accept to endorse your actions by taking you out of the loop.

For your personal knowledge (describes you),

Selfish: adjective /ˈsel.fɪʃ/
Someone who is selfish only thinks of their own advantage.

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/selfish

ya, thatguy really screwed over PDM...

way more than he did to LaF.

PDM is coming on the forums trying to flame and blame LaF, specifically me -- the all x country who wasted 1.5b in stock killing this guy -- when the problem started in PDM, continued with PDM and is now being expanded by PDM...

this is both unbelievable and expected :p

What's your point? I've already said my actions were selfish. And selfishness and apathy are not mutually exclusive.

yes... thatguy is one apathetic player!!

drop the first a, though :p

lawl

ZING!

Didn't read this thread, but I agree with this topic.

lol :)

tell me when I get my reps, jeez.

through all this complaining, and we're not even half way through the reps yet.

well, i am sure my country # is posted if you get land,and i have sent pacts...

KHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!K;LFJSD;FJS;AD