Verified:

Thomas Game profile

Member
1763

Aug 22nd 2010, 17:06:13

Can you lay it out for me? I hear you retal L:L on ALL LGs. Really? I know you guys can't be that lame.

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5658

Aug 22nd 2010, 17:32:45

do you retal land:land on topfeeds?

Thomas Game profile

Member
1763

Aug 22nd 2010, 17:37:15

You get more land if you have equal land & NW.

Whose FA over there? Because if you follow through with this, things will be getting hairy for sure.

ponderer Game profile

Member
678

Aug 22nd 2010, 17:41:10

We retal buildings:buildings, not land:land.

If you grab one of our members running a techer, we will retal until we get every single lab back.


Cheers,
[not the] Rage President

**this is spam, not the Rage president, not the real rage retal policy**
m0m0rific

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5658

Aug 22nd 2010, 17:58:58

Originally posted by Thomas:
You get more land if you have equal land & NW.

Whose FA over there? Because if you follow through with this, things will be getting hairy for sure.



im no RAGE FA but im always looking to land grab people.

So if you are publicly saying that you do not retal land grabs by land:land than I will LG one of you guys tagged Sanct50 and make off with alot of your land and you wont be able to recover more than 60% of your land back in 1 retal.

and this will also invite others to LG your tag as you do not accept or enforce land:land :)

your call

toma Game profile

Member
313

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:00:14

rage retals 1:Kill
Originally posted by Slagpit:
Ruining peoples fun for no reason is okay, but ruining it for a reason I disagree with isn't okay. Never change, community.

Thomas Game profile

Member
1763

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:00:59

Check our retals this reset. We get hit once, we authorize 1 retal. But we make sure we get all the land back and then some to ward off people from LG'ing us. Not our fault you guys can't do the same.

And like I said. The grabbing formula allows for more land if you are closer in NW & Land to the target you're grabbing. You get less on a topfeed.

And if I have to go through each and every LG on RAGE to prove you guys don't enforce L:L on all hits, I will. I've already stumbled across a few.

Thomas Game profile

Member
1763

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:06:55

Anddddddddd, you can call it a topfeed if you wish. 3K acres isn't that big of a deal. Especially when you guys are having so much fun land trading.

The country that hit you was a Tyranny with 132% Mil Strat. Go ahead and get confirmation on the landgrabbing formula.

Ivan Game profile

Member
2368

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:13:18


Eh thomas youve played this game long enough to know that a lot of tags retals L:L i dont see why this is such a suprise to you?

Thomas Game profile

Member
1763

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:15:59

Besides the fact that L:L has helped destroy this game, the only time I've seen it enforced in recent times is when an ally hits an ally. LGs are a part of the game. If you get hit, then, as an alliance, you should make sure the offending country gets retalled for more than they took. L:L is just the lazy way out.

Ivan Game profile

Member
2368

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:20:34


L:L hasnt destroyed this game in anyway, if defense was as strong as offensive is then perhaps id tend to agree with you but attacking power ie PS is waaay too strong in the game which encourages stupid hits and thus L:L was created and implemented

it also tends to avoid a lot of wars because if 1 tag does a hit on another tag which they cant retal and get their acres back nothing is there to stop the other tag from having a 1k acre country hit a 15k acre country in the other tag so they wont get all their acers back either and eventually there is wars

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5658

Aug 22nd 2010, 18:22:28

The land trade was a test. Maybe you should go back and read that thread again and how the verdict on land trading is not worth it.

And as Ivan posted every one does land to land
Go try your luck with my boys at LaF and see how far you get

PimpThang

Member
103

Aug 24th 2010, 13:14:12

Rage is not a strong enough alliance to make this policy stick. I foresee them getting spanked real soon.

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4328

Aug 24th 2010, 13:17:33

Originally posted by SuperFly:
And as Ivan posted every one does land to land
Go try your luck with my boys at LaF and see how far you get



What's LaF got to do with this?
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5658

Aug 24th 2010, 15:38:36

Nuke my brother, read the whole thread.

The post you quoted means that every one retals land:land. Go try topfeeding an allaince like LaF or Evo or whoever and see if they will retal your topfeed with land:land or if they will accept your policy of topfeeds/LGs are retaled 1:1.

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5658

Aug 24th 2010, 15:39:24

Originally posted by PimpThang:
Rage is not a strong enough alliance to make this policy stick. I foresee them getting spanked real soon.


Are you new to the game/server? Land:Land retals are standard on this server.

-edit-

just saw your post on team server board you are a new player. Welcome to EE :)

Nasjym Game profile

Member
164

Aug 24th 2010, 16:15:29

Collab (Sanct50) will NOT accept L:L retals that have not been authorized by an FA. If Rage retals L:L, they had better contact me before they help themselves.



Collab HFA

PimpThang

Member
103

Aug 24th 2010, 17:03:08

Thanks Superfly. Ya, ive played a game similar to this server. I enjoyed it but i thought id try something different. So here i am. From what i can tell no alliance looks strong enough to enforce a L/L policy. Too many close alliances. Unless they ALL accept that.

ponderer Game profile

Member
678

Aug 24th 2010, 17:25:00

Originally posted by PimpThang:
Thanks Superfly. From what i can tell no alliance looks strong enough to enforce a L/L policy. Too many close alliances. Unless they ALL accept that.


Or a few of them join a coalition.
m0m0rific

dustfp Game profile

Member
710

Aug 24th 2010, 21:04:57

hard to call an attack a topfeed when both countries were top 5 and there was only a difference of like 1.5k acres...
-fudgepuppy
SancTuarY President
icq: 123820211
msn:
aim: fudgepuppy6988
http://collab.boxcarhosting.com

SuperFly Game profile

Member
5658

Aug 24th 2010, 21:31:53

again I do not represent RAGE in anyway shape or form here on these boards but that 1.5k land seems to make a differance when it comes to retaling. here is an example:


Aug 22/10 2:07:48 PM PS I R Under Cover (#345) (Rage) Your mom was dtf last night (#13) (SancT50) 1009 A (+475 A)
Aug 21/10 5:55:34 PM PS Your mom was dtf last night (#13) (SancT50) I R Under Cover (#345) (Rage) 1631 A (+968 A)

I personally hope that both sides can reach a friendly agreement :)

Edited By: SuperFly on Aug 24th 2010, 21:36:07
See Original Post

dustfp Game profile

Member
710

Aug 24th 2010, 21:47:51

the land difference in that situation did not cause the differing returns
it was the fact that #13 is tyr with mil strat tech
is being a tyr with mil strat the definition of a topfeed now?
-fudgepuppy
SancTuarY President
icq: 123820211
msn:
aim: fudgepuppy6988
http://collab.boxcarhosting.com

Thomas Game profile

Member
1763

Aug 24th 2010, 23:11:04

Originally posted by SuperFly:
again I do not represent RAGE in anyway shape or form here on these boards but that 1.5k land seems to make a differance when it comes to retaling. here is an example:


Aug 22/10 2:07:48 PM PS I R Under Cover (#345) (Rage) Your mom was dtf last night (#13) (SancT50) 1009 A (+475 A)
Aug 21/10 5:55:34 PM PS Your mom was dtf last night (#13) (SancT50) I R Under Cover (#345) (Rage) 1631 A (+968 A)

I personally hope that both sides can reach a friendly agreement :)


So.... you guys never noticed the LGing country was a Tyranny with Military Tech? LOL. Blame it on the topfeed...