Mar 7th 2012, 2:53:40
Originally posted by Mapleson:
It's ironic that most "landtraders" stick to a single parter as there is a slim pool of countries with matching NW, land, and strategy. If more people would embrace the game mechanics for their own gain then there would be less incidences of multi-hits per day trades.
There are 164 countries over 20k land and 12 over 50k land (5 RD, 2 LaF, 2 Evo, 1 Rival, 1 PDM, 1 Neofed). That's 1/3 of alliances represented: 6 cases of land grabbing/"landtrading", 2 cases of war farming (LAF), 2 cases of farming into deep DR (EVO), and 1 case of internal tag hitting (Neofed). That seems to me to be a good mix of strategies and player interactions.
Adapt or die. I wonder when SoF will live up to their name.
There are 164 countries over 20k land and 12 over 50k land (5 RD, 2 LaF, 2 Evo, 1 Rival, 1 PDM, 1 Neofed). That's 1/3 of alliances represented: 6 cases of land grabbing/"landtrading", 2 cases of war farming (LAF), 2 cases of farming into deep DR (EVO), and 1 case of internal tag hitting (Neofed). That seems to me to be a good mix of strategies and player interactions.
Adapt or die. I wonder when SoF will live up to their name.
This is the first post in this thread that makes crystal clear sense to me. Given the alliances posted as involved in this thread, 7 of the 12 countries in this high land bracket traded with each other. That's over 50% of the available pool