Nov 19th 2013, 14:27:04
getafix, but what if that D ally goes ALL d for you as well!??
(as is the case with ebert and his ally RR)
the only case where the above makes sense to me is if a D ally has basically 0 D, is doubled by 'the leecher's' D, and the leecher loses a ton of turrets from protecting numerous attacks on his undefended ally.
in the case of ebert, he is not only getting free tech, he also has a player that is giving him free D. taht is running a D heavy strat, with no intention of finishing well, only to play turns as they come and to give ebert as much D from allies as humanly possible
(as is the case with ebert and his ally RR)
the only case where the above makes sense to me is if a D ally has basically 0 D, is doubled by 'the leecher's' D, and the leecher loses a ton of turrets from protecting numerous attacks on his undefended ally.
in the case of ebert, he is not only getting free tech, he also has a player that is giving him free D. taht is running a D heavy strat, with no intention of finishing well, only to play turns as they come and to give ebert as much D from allies as humanly possible