Lol. Laf claiming victory now? Pretty rich. You guys got tked before the rest of the war even happened. Similar to if elders claimed victory in the ab fs set because laf was eventually killed off and elders finished with higher Nw. But no, even I'm not stupid enough to call that a win. You guys tk'd us way before any of that and war was won by LaF.

Claiming victory in two sets that you we're tag killed is silly.

I know right? I feel like I recognize that country name in lafxpurp from another tag last set. But eh, we'll probably get blamed for it so I'll just accept it now. Haha

Remember last set when we were too scared to attack them alone? Lol

Similar. But different.

And do we get to vote?

I vote for LaFxPurp

Awe man. You won't give us a pact? We were really hoping to sign that uGFY

Yeah.

+1 for at ban removals.

Feel like it's getting progressive over there lol

Sounds like you've got it about right.

Lol, Spartacus didn't fs a netting tag. Syko you killing it in here. That's a solid 3 or 4 statements this thread that you had no idea what you are talking about and we haven't even hit page two Lol.

Lol. We did not entice your suiciders. You enticed your suiciders. Not recognizing that is horribly ignorant. They hit on their own accord and you need to take them seriously because they walled you very well.

But then, I wouldnt feel the need to inform you of anything if you weren't incredibly ignorant to everything. Everything you say lacks any sort of basis in fact. I'm just trying to help you out with some facts bro. I swear it'll only help your arguments.

Are laf leaders not telling its members what they are doing again? Sheesh. I figured lesson learned by now.

Last I checked your bosses were refusing to pact both stones and imag unless things have changed in the last few days. Just thought you guys should know. Do I need to start posting chat logs on AT to keep LaF members informed what the hell is going on over there?

LaF lost by getting totally creamed by some clans

Elders lost by getting totally creamed by some other clans

Sol lost by getting all butthurt and drinking that lafdog haterade

Stones lost because Sol lived

Imag lost because they didn't die

SC won. SC will be along to confirm shortly.

Like a Gemini. Only the good die young twice.

After 3 solid weeks of existence, it is with a heavy heart I must announce the end of Badass Forces United. In our rich 3 week history we managed a great 2-0 record including not only tag kills, but total tag eliminations. If there never be another perfect war clan, then we shall go down in Earth's great history books that everyone cares a lot about as most near to perfect.

As they say, only the good die young.

Also, I'm not sure how you lump the Florida nightclub in with leftists. That was a dude that pledged himself to ISIS. In a sense, zionism is the opposite of progressive thought for a Muslim. It kind of defies the left or right political spectrum of america. But it is a sort of extreme religious conservativism. You know. The gay bashing racist religious conservative type. Which would align them more with the neo-nazi or white supremacist movement in america just wearing a different color.

Lol. I'm sure. Now we're all on the watch list lol.

But yeah. Even that dude that peppered those republican senators a few years back. Lots of violence from essentially every ideology. I think crazy comes in almost any type of package.

...suppose that's why I feel like it's super lame to single out Muslims. We've seen crazy in every color, size, shape and creed.

Man, Heston. Do you even pay attention? Lol @ left wing.

Charleston, the planned parenthood shootings, Oak Creek, etc.

Mental illness comes in many different forms my dude. We've seen both sides of it.

Yeah. It's funny. The news was asking someone how they could possibly sneak rifles into a hotel. I was like, hmm. Ive snuck huge bags of weed, people, road flares and even a dog in. It's not very difficult lol

Yeah. Gg all. If you weren't having fun you weren't paying attention. That was good times.

End of the day, at least for me, id be somewhat OK giving up some 2nd amendment rights IF the police were not being militarized and the whole budget wasn't being dumped into the military. I was born at night but not last night.

Start baiting. I can't break you with my third restart

Haha. You can take the boy out of the country.....

Like 3rd straight set where he hasn't gotten to wall. That's gotta be disappointing.

Lol. But iiii lubbbbs joooo.

All in for the last one. You know how it goes lol. And you only get to wall when you play with us lol

Yep. Sui is not wrong. I could buy an unliscensed AR-15 on silk road or something right now if I wanted. I'm all for closing the gun show loophole but whether these guns were semi-automatic or full auto, it's been at least noted to this point that they were obtained illegally. Which, given the scope of things that can be purchased illegally online, any person in essentially any country could more than likely find a way to obtain weapons of they decide to be a psycho.

People who are licensed gun owners in america, like myself, are hardly ever the ones who fly off the rails like this. Responsible gun ownership by responsible gun owners is not really the culprit here. Hell, they ship from Russia on agora market. And when one website closes another pops up. Putting restrictions on the guns that licensed gun owners get is not going to solve the problem, it's more likely just going to aggravate it. Gun violence in america is traditionally lower in "open carry" states. Even psychopaths are smart enough not to point a .45 in the face of a man with a desert eagle on his hip.

Since the illegal acquisition of firearms will always be a possibility, and as we've seen in repeated shootings now a very easy thing. I find it wise to keep the people who obtained their weapon through the right process armed. Perhaps then we will have a chance to stop a thing like this.

Prayers out to those who've lost and to those that have suffered. It's an unimaginable thing.

Well jump us then lol. Maki and llaar have no living countries. We need something to do these last two days.

I'm uncertain there is even a tag to join at this point. We wiped lcon off the server entirely yesterday. Though none of us have very large countries, if you're big it may be impossible for us lol

Typically...

Also, tell maki to Retag so we quit just killing you llaar. I wanna speed the wealth lol

Lol. 3 topfeeds is 3 more topfeeds than Id care for though I don't see your exaggerating as helpful. If you've ever talked to me you'd know I think that's a bs way to get land from any alliance at any time unless you are attempting to start a war with that alliance. But no. 200% doesn't prevent anything. It absolutely entices members of a clan that hate laf to see if they will actually enforce it. It has the absolute exact opposite effect of a deterrent. As does elders <1:kill policy. Difference is we want to kill. You want to net.

I did accept a retal on the one that was taken for another alliance (omega) and havoc was even there to witness that if there are any questions about it. I personally thought that could be worked out in a mutually beneficial way which is the very essence of give and take. Havoc can attest to that as well.

Gains, I had no part on your choice of a $30 black and tan. An imperial stout mixed with a double citra hopped IPA sounds terrible. I claim no responsibility for that lol. I heard that clown shoes started distributing out your way. Undead Party Crasher (aka Vampire Slayer depending on the release) is very very fluffing solid if you can get your hands on it. Also I would like to point to that as one of my favorite posts of the year. I'm planning to jump off a building bro. Just haven't found the right one yet.

http://earthgraphs.com/...2CLCoN&warreport=Show

Both bad4u and good for you we're technically tagged at the beginning of war activity and the lcon war was defo separate but this should give a good summary of our activity

Aye but my question (originally) was regarding the logical implication of a statement rather than the literal arrangement. No?

2 players. Sheesh. Llaar said he was looking for war. I responded in typical tongue and cheek. Makinso tagged over a handful of countries he wasn't netting with and they fs'd us that evening per our invitation. I think it was maybe 24 countries ish. Though I don't think either side viewed it as a "war." It's far more of a "party." Not an invite only party either. BAD4U just wanna be bad. Like in a Michael Jackson bad sorta way. We kill you next if you desire. But we nice folks. Just happen to be bad too.

If you truly wanted to net, you'd have worked with us. You chose to make those outrageous demands instead of helping us let you net. Chose to call us pact breakers. Chose to declare war on us. And now you're dealing with the consequences of that. It's that simple. There was always going to need to be a bit of give and take to keep the peace this set. It's unfortunate, IMO, that didn't happen.

I meant semantics as in the logical aspects of the words said. Such as the implication. Think lexical semantics. As in, what is the actual meaning of the words that were said?

Also, anything after 7 hits at least used to be considered a "kill" for most clans Ive been in. In that way one can reach a reasonable amount of reps and retals. I know your only part in that conversation was calculating the ridiculous amount of reps demanded from a clan that hates you but was attempting to let you net anyways. I know LaF never did even their allies that favor but MD, ICN, ELY, RAGE and most other clans I was a part of would not expect $280b as a reasonable request. A more reasonable request would have been reps on around 40k acres and that we kill the country. $280b is a silly request.

Even so. Detagging suicider does not equate to an FS. They're clearly not the same.

I did edit that to say DP almost instantly Gerdy. Sorry you was already typing. I should edit fastah

Yeah. That and if we hadn't hit, they'd still be whining that we somehow broke pact. Hitting just changed the logic and not the fact that all these same members were trying to justify these same statements a different way two or three weeks ago. If I'm going to get called a ham sammich I might as well be a ham sammich.

Tag kill upon the enemy LCoN. 2 for 2. So bad for you! So so so so so bad^2

Or is it? Life is not so black and white, brother, as we've seen in this post. If the only clause that mattered was the only clause in the pact that regarded only the FS, as you say. Then why did your president say the pact was broken 3 times on AT and declare war on us prior to the FS? Hmm?

To claim the pact was broken by a detagging suicider but also that the pact can only be broken by an FS makes no sense. According to DP, there should be no question of when the pact was broken which puts both of you in complete disagreement with the leadership of your clan.

And no. A detagging suicider does not and has not ever counted as an FS. EVER

If you really feel that way DP you should take it up with Vic and not us.

Because Vic said it was already broken on AT no less than three times and declared war on us.

*searches for an Alt key on his cell phone*

Maki you liar! There's no such thing as an Alt key!

Liberty. Ha! Don't make me laugh. And don't make yourselves LaF

Ahh so checking with a more reputable source like don tob....