Originally posted by Imperial:
This is biased to alliances that net.
Alliances that war I guess are not considered top alliances anymore (SoF).
Omega should also be up there.
So should Monsters since this is so biased towards netting.
No, it's NOT biased towards alliances that net--it's biased towards those that make top TNW, ANW, and membership--the 3 measurements on alliances in the game itself. Just because alliances that do so are those that happen to primarily be netters doesn't mean that those that don't net all the time can't be up there as well. They just have to be consistent.
Also, I agree that Omega should have a place up there, maybe as an honorable mention or something. They've always been on the heels of LaF and Evo in their rankings, and we've always had to keep an eye on them when the end of the set got close. I might do an edit on that sometime.