Verified:

Mr Azure

Member
65

Dec 31st 2017, 23:00:57

ok you can be the boss. what are your orders?

Mr Azure

Member
65

Dec 31st 2017, 22:25:28

braden i still love you.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Dec 31st 2017, 4:07:39

jesus this game is in worse shape then i thought, people are actually welcoming RD back lol.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Dec 30th 2017, 5:49:14

Please contact myself or Mr Diamond for pacting.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 31st 2013, 4:18:50

Originally posted by bertz:
Locket, the weight of the punishment depends on what was done.
The current scandal is far worse than what Hanlong did. Like what other players said, just redirect your hatred to your leaders and not to the admins. They're just doing this so in the future, alliances will not tolerate any members hacking/cheating. As what the admins say
, in RD's case, most of your leaders knew about the hacking.


uh no, most of the leaders did NOT know about the hacking. as a matter of fact, none knew.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 31st 2013, 3:28:26

yea that must be it

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 31st 2013, 3:26:30

Originally posted by echlori:
Originally posted by iScode:
Originally posted by Fuji:
Originally posted by En4cer85:
Sof were and have been outnumbered for a long time in this war :P

That's funny, they didn't have a problem launching a OOP FS with a 25 member advantage. All we did was turn it around and give ourselves a 20 country advantage. One would think that attacking Rival and giving SoF/Rival the numbers advantage would have made everyone happy, but how could anyone know Rival would literally do nothing but let us hit them over and over again?

Oh well. Everyone knows LaF honours their pacts, and we all knew this was a possibility. I look forward to the SoF keyboard warriors coming out from their bunkers to tell everyone how big and bad they are behind the LaF juggernaut.


lol oh ok, so we are just meant to let you decide who we choose to war along side?

Your mistake was hitting rival and expecting us to follow your plan, that was never going to happen...


Scode you're hilarious. You're telling me Rival wasn't going to FS MD/SOL?


I can tell you with certainty that they were not.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 30th 2013, 23:26:34

just stop heretodie.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 30th 2013, 0:49:36

Originally posted by Taveren:
Originally posted by Mr. Copper:
yep. This is pang as usual putting his personal feelings into this game. I have requested evidence from pang that I did ANYTHING at all and have nothing. Qz pointed me back at the post that has no evidence.

This is how it goes. Someone cheated? must be RD
Looks like hacking? Must be the guy that called me an idiot last time and warned me about it.

I'll be waiting on evidence.


You're saying that you, or any member of RD, weren't involved in using several users' credentials to log in to LCN, MD, PDM and Rage boxcar sites from...

93.115.84.122
93.115.84.124

...and make copies of member lists including phone numbers and emails?


i fail to see how that proves RD had anything to do with it. a romanian IP logging into those sites. only player from romania i know is alin. isnt he an MD member?

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 30th 2013, 0:34:25

Pang youre still a ****. no real proof, but youve been looking for a reason to do something like this.

while were on the subject or hacking, why dont you tell everyone how you used your admin access to read RDs private boards last year.

Edited By: Patience on Nov 5th 2013, 21:14:13. Reason: Potty mouth...
See Original Post

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 29th 2013, 22:33:17

yep.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 29th 2013, 22:12:13

Originally posted by Pride:
Even #s sure. I'm saying RD now and MD now. You get the FS we have a 13+ member advantage. I'd say we win that.


good chance, especially with the new changes.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 29th 2013, 21:49:03

Originally posted by Pride:
Originally posted by Hopeless:
Would love to see RD vs MD next set


RD with the FS couldn't beat MD. IMO.


you know what the say about opinions ;)

but assuming even numbers, it could go either way depending on the set. both alliances have had mediocre showings and good showings.

anyways RD and MD have warred twice, they won once, we won once. both times were gangbangs.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 29th 2013, 21:17:52

Originally posted by tellarion:
Well, I have logs showing confirmation from Azure that PDM and RD signed a pact. So yeah...


no you dont.

im currently trying to salvage the situation with elves so please no more speculation. i apologize to PDM for not being very clear during my last conversation and i never intended what i said to be construed as confirming a pact being in place and i do understand why someone might take it that way.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 29th 2013, 2:21:52

Originally posted by Makinso:
IT died!


http://youtu.be/ERTT_sv8sV0?t=2m41s

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 28th 2013, 22:31:31

4-5 hours from what i heard

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 28th 2013, 21:19:10

i know we shouldve just let them hit us first like they were planning. but we would be the bad guy for that too.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 27th 2013, 14:38:49

my fluff does smell good. :)

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 27th 2013, 14:34:38

Originally posted by Pang:
Originally posted by Mr Azure:
Originally posted by Pang:
RD: 50ish members
LCN: <20
Evo: <25

Money is on RD calling in help. They don't have the skill to fight even a nearly balanced war by themselves.



pang your bitterness of being a failed alliance leader brings me great joy.


Who's bitter or failed? I accomplished all my in-game goals as a leader 6 years ago.... and then I started focusing on hosting, the wider game & bringing in some money. All missions accomplished :p

it sounds like you're the one who's bitter if thinking that brings you joy, tbh...

Now get back to LaF and SoF's feet and start grovelling, like a good RD'er does.


*sniff sniff*

never knew bitter smelled so sweet.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 27th 2013, 14:13:33

Originally posted by Pang:
RD: 50ish members
LCN: <20
Evo: <25

Money is on RD calling in help. They don't have the skill to fight even a nearly balanced war by themselves.



pang your bitterness of being a failed alliance leader brings me great joy.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 27th 2013, 13:03:56

you can tell RD is more important cause he named us first.

neener neener EVO

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 27th 2013, 4:47:34

is that little tella going hella hard on the drums?

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 23rd 2013, 0:26:49

Originally posted by Servant:
No Sov, we are not practicing this.

We do not require anyone to sign our allies before we sign you. We don't even ask.


I do wish to apologize to RD.

I did find where we talked about a LDP, (me and an RD head, and it was agreed that is was an good idea and should happen.)

It wasn't promised, and I didn't keep other IRC logs of convo's, so while many people would have taken it was a for granted it would happen, and I did, it isn't explicit enough, for me to take a stand on.



ill give you credit for admitting that you were mistaken, however you still havent answered me. is this not true?

Originally posted by Mr Azure:


you were offered to be able to take retals, not only that i offered you countries that you could actually break unlike the countries that were owed retals in which you couldnt have broken. at least admit that.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 20th 2013, 4:50:48

Originally posted by Servant:
That is not a lie.

Azure, Gainsboro and I had talks of this, as did Vic. Now, I'll go see if I can find it.

BUt anyone that knows me knows I would not post a lie. I have 14 yrs of credibility to back that one up.


ok lets assume it was offered. i told you, i would sign a pact if you signed our allies. you refused, not me. we didnt promise to sign it unconditionally.

and you are lying about half of it. you were offered to be able to take retals, not only that i offered you countries that you could actually break unlike the countries that were owed retals in which you couldnt have broken. at least admit that.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 20th 2013, 3:29:13

Originally posted by Servant:
That doesn't change, the fact we were promised a LDP as an upgrade when we dropped multiple retals last set.



thats a lie. logs of this promise? i remember very specifically offering my country up for retals, so did another color. and i remember them also being taken. granted the members who took them were very nice and leinent but dont pretend it didnt happen

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 18th 2013, 2:30:09

you heard it here first, MD supports child labor.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 17th 2013, 4:08:18

Originally posted by Junky:
Originally posted by MauricXe:
Originally posted by Junky:
Kind of wondering why SoF FS'd MD, they weren't apart of the war last set, I'm thinking if SoF would have left MD alone this set, they wouldn't have war'd SoF this set too..


MD was very much a part of the war last set. They sent massive FA to SoL.

As for MD's intentions, they were more than ready for what transpired. Look no further than there state of MD vid.


Giving FA isn't really apart of the War, by those standards the clans giving SoF were apart of the war, and could be killed.



FAing a new restart into a breaker almost every day plus aiding several other countries isnt a part of war? its war by proxy. and yes they could be "killed" if one of the alliances wanted to war over it like SoF is.

MD wasnt wrong for sending FA last set. SoF isnt wrong for holding them accountable either. it is what it is.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 14th 2013, 1:12:32

how did monsters get driven from the server? they FSed SoF in a gangbang last set and even after that were given a pact by SoF this set. clearly SoF drove them away.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 13th 2013, 7:30:43

Originally posted by Alin:
Originally posted by galleri:
Alin back to his usual.....
apparently had no clue what went on last set.


I am pretty much sure that Sof@Co got more FA than Sol@Co with no evidence ( maybe someone should finally hack Qzjul and tell the mighty truth). Add to that Laf entry in what was an even numbers/war. 10 days of that ( Laf killing evo/ RD Laf faing Sof) would change any war into the other outcome. Whatever followed has less importance.

The explanation of Sof receiving more FA is simple : Laf and RD can provide more Fa than MD.

Judging by Sof EE motto : "if we could we did " and taking into account that nothing ever stop them to fight 3:1 or 2:1 members ratio wars - i don`t think smth changed last reset and they did not collected the collectable advantages.

P.S: i hope that is at least 0.5 of a clue.

Now i don`t want to upset a NAZY mod but those are my toughts about it. Say hi to Soviet - tell him i know a place where he can, once again , kick the ass of his wife and a sheep | - * |



that might be correct if MD was the only one FAing SOL, which was not the case. but nice try though.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 13th 2013, 7:12:38

i dont know if this was an intentional change, but defender losses on special attacks is not right.

2 countries, 10k acres 25m networth. 1 country is a 10m GS break. attacking country sending 10.3m troops.

Your forces invaded camaroland (#3)!
They broke through the defender's defences!
2617 Civilians
They took:
10,602 Bushels
$117,795,422
Your military lost:
824,000 Troops
Your enemy lost:
400,000 Troops

defender loses 4% while attacker loses 8%

same countries only defender has been demoralized to 72% readiness, attacker sending 7.4m troops

Your forces invaded camaroland (#3)!
They broke through the defender's defences!
They destroyed:
2531 Civilians
They took:
10,597 Bushels
$117,711,039
Your military lost:
592,000 Troops
Your enemy lost:
500,000 Troops

offender still losing 8%, defender now loosing 5%

again, same countries only now a 10m BR break

Your forces invaded camaroland (#3)!
They broke through the defender's defences!
They destroyed:
1281 Civilians
242 Buildings
Your military lost:
832,000 Jets
Your enemy lost:
600,000 Turrets


attacker still losing 8%, but defender now loses 6%

i dont remember seeing an announcement saying defenders losses would drop, actually qzjul mentioned that they would be unaffected for the first 3 hits and would stay the same as long as there was more then 1 second between attacks. there was never this kind of difference between attacker and defender loses. it was alway either 4% or 8% (i forget) for both parties with the defender losing more then attacker per attack when the defender had been demoralized.

now lets go back to the 10m GS countries, only lets lemming them sending 5m troops

Your forces invaded (#289)!
The defender held against your forces, causing them to retreat!

Your military lost:
400,000 Troops
Your enemy lost:
439,747 Troops

you still lose 8% but now they lose 4.4%. so basically its more economical to break a country down with lemmings for the first 15-20 hits since theyll lose more and youll lose half as much as you would if you were sending twice as much to actually break them.

this doesnt seem correct to me.

EDIT: this was done with monarchy govt. i just attempted the same test with dictatorship and the result were all over the place up and down but still much heavier losses for the attacker. lemming results actually remained identical though

Edited By: Mr Azure on Oct 13th 2013, 7:53:03
See Original Post

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 12th 2013, 3:57:22

the main problem with O allies is you can have 3 vs 2 defense allies, and you also get a 50% bonus from PS making attacking overpowered. plus its easy for people to have 3 friends run all jetters and double your attack strength.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 11th 2013, 18:30:21

says the guy whos name is ford and drives a chevy. dont worry im repping ford for you.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 11th 2013, 18:24:04

Originally posted by mrford:
Originally posted by Mr Azure:
Originally posted by iScode:
4age is the type of motor, if it was a 2001 i would say it was


toyotas are pretty much all POS. only one worth remembering


http://youtu.be/xKXZT70gwNg


you just quoted fast and furious. you are no longer allowed to weigh in on car talk. thanks.


fluff you F&F is a classic. without F&F there would never have been an influx of ricers to laugh at.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 10th 2013, 22:19:35

Originally posted by iScode:
4age is the type of motor, if it was a 2001 i would say it was


toyotas are pretty much all POS. only one worth remembering


http://youtu.be/xKXZT70gwNg

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 6th 2013, 0:07:52

you owe me a set. remember that thing you did that time?

Mr Azure

Member
65

Oct 6th 2013, 0:06:37

Dude, how many times are you gonna do this?

stop making troll threads

Mr Azure

Member
65

Sep 22nd 2013, 21:03:48

thats true prank because Mr Azure > mrford.

SoF wouldnt have a chance

Mr Azure

Member
65

Sep 22nd 2013, 20:54:42

jesus christ HTD stfu.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Sep 22nd 2013, 16:56:24

hows GTAV

Mr Azure

Member
65

Sep 22nd 2013, 16:52:33

you sold MW3 and i dont play black cops 2 because its a fluff treyarch game.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Sep 22nd 2013, 16:47:41

so youre bad at both games ford? :P

im getting BF4 also. i was never very good at 3 but it was a nice change of pace from CoD. not having to worry about fluff spawns is a huge plus

Mr Azure

Member
65

Aug 25th 2013, 17:18:27

Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by Xinhuan:
According to their retal policy, it isn't. In fact, the word kill isn't even in the policy.


According to Rage's policy? What about your policy?


rage decided to try to enforce their policy, why does LaFs policy have to do with it?

Mr Azure

Member
65

Aug 25th 2013, 15:40:46

Originally posted by crest23:
Keep all untagged countries at 99 turns until they tag up. Alliance server should not be for untagged countries.


whats the difference if they are untagged or they tag up in a 1 man tag to circumvent it?

Mr Azure

Member
65

Aug 23rd 2013, 21:56:49

you can forum PM me or find me in IRC. or mrazurerd on skype.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Aug 11th 2013, 5:40:17

dissy vic was obviously being sarcastic lol.

Mr Azure

Member
65

Jul 14th 2013, 21:20:54

YOU WILL BE DIENING SOON BRD.