Verified:

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Sep 2nd 2015, 23:48:07

Originally posted by breeze:
There you go OTH LAST WORD


A typical response from a 13 yr old child

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Sep 2nd 2015, 4:46:43

Originally posted by Over The Hill:
Please don't embarrass yourself breeze by trying to get the last word in this time because the facts clearly speak for themselves.....between you and I, you're the blowhard here.


Originally posted by breeze:
Keep talking Peanut. Had to dig for your stats did ya Peanut man. Why don't you piss off and mind your own business. You spew crap from your mouth. You're nothing an attention seeking idiot. You are not Einstein dumb ass


Originally posted by breeze:
HMMMM (deep voice and serious) well let me see Ive made 315 posts since May 21st 2012. You know what peanut man SHUT UP and who cares about your posts or your bonuses.


I told you not to embarrass yourself. When faced with strong facts all you can come back with is pure garbage. This time you had to make back to back posts. Posted once at 2:59:14 stewed about it for 40 minutes and posted again at 3:39:30 LMFAO

You really do need to know when to STFU and let things go.

You go right ahead and get the last word in like you always have to do. You really are a little drama queen in high heels.

Prove me right

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Sep 2nd 2015, 1:46:08

Originally posted by breeze:
You run your mouth an awful lot


hmmmmmm........the stats show that I made 315 posts since May 21,2012. I post so little that I was forced to make 44 "bonus" posts or else I would loose bonus points.
That works out to 271 posts in 1195 days or 1 post every 4.4 days

your stats show you made 341 posts since Oct 14,2014. You were only forced to make a mere 2 "bonus" posts.
That works out to 339 posts in 321 days or 4.6 posts every 4.4 days

The stats show that you're making 4.6 times the number of posts than me and you have the nerve to say that "I run my mouth an awful lot" LMFAO

I state facts....you sprew garbage.

Please don't embarrass yourself breeze by trying to get the last word in this time because the facts clearly speak for themselves.....between you and I, you're the blowhard here.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Sep 1st 2015, 23:56:09

I see the little high heeled wearing drama queen breeze must still always have to get the last word in on every single fluffing comment made.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 31st 2015, 12:37:38


Originally posted by alexsiki:
what is 1a


Back in the late 90's this Primary server was known as 1B and the Alliance server was known as 1A.

Most old school vets still refer to these two servers as 1B & 1A

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 31st 2015, 2:25:50

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 30th 2015, 23:07:59

Hey Jayr...

I see you just dropped 1413 acres and switched your gov't from Demo to Dictator

Do you think that instant boost to your SPAL will be enough to protect you?

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 30th 2015, 1:32:42

Originally posted by grimjoww:
For what lol


Originally posted by Spoonman:
What a FS imag! Wooot. Good job! Attention seekers never fail to impress me.


Originally posted by Untagged Hunter:
These ifags never learn


Originally posted by tellarion:
Why?


Originally posted by Buch:
Because breeze is a tard


Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:

Ok....how about warring a war alliance, not rocket science, well maybe for imag it is :-)


Originally posted by mytanksgoboom:
You people are angry.


Originally posted by Rasp:
Even when imag gets tagkilled, it's still a win for them.


Originally posted by ninong:
looks like TPA rejected this war dec lol


Originally posted by archaic:
ditto, but iMag has pretty much always sucked


Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 25th 2015, 9:18:36

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 10th 2015, 1:47:13

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 7th 2015, 14:10:19



Originally posted by justtaint:
Originally posted by mrford:
imag has more than a decade old tradition of FSing netting clans or starting stupid wars they have no chance of winning.

some people require more than a "but we have changed!" in order to shift their negative view of a clan. it is that simple.


I agree 100%.


it would appear after imag's backstabbing,cowardly,unprovoked, no warning, FS against the netting MONSTERS they again lose another war

Last count shows 4 dead imag countries to MONSTERS 3 dead.

I guess this is imag's new war strategy....FS a late reset war so time will run out saving them the embarrassment of getting tag killed

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 3rd 2015, 23:12:33

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Aug 2nd 2015, 23:04:47

Originally posted by BladeEWG:
Also funny how a SOFty ran into GDI for protection


Stones claim Moral victory!!

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 29th 2015, 20:12:09

Unless you are highly skilled at playing a commie/indy you need a minimum 50k acres to break into the top 10

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 29th 2015, 2:44:17

Originally posted by Untagged Hunter:
that too but since that jackass leader breeze took over, imag IS definitely on alliance's spam list.


+1

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 27th 2015, 20:13:20

Originally posted by ssewellusmc:
They are a spam tag


Originally posted by Untagged Hunter:
BTW, imag is classified as spam tag.


Originally posted by elvesrus:
still waiting to hear how you justify iMag as a spam tag considering the circumstances noted above which you conveniently ignored.


although imag may not officially meet the definition of a spam tag according to the EWPP, their asinine behaviour and pisspoor leadership judgement(both traits that ALL spam tags have in common) place imag at the top of the "spam tag" category.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 27th 2015, 10:35:06

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 25th 2015, 20:46:02

Originally posted by Untagged Hunter:
Wow, lame..


Originally posted by Warster:
yeah this is normal for Imag


Originally posted by Warster:
Imag only like fighting alliances that aren't war prepared


Originally posted by Cerberus:
You need to DIE! I will be looking for Imag blood next round. :) Freaking panks can't leave the peaceful alone thus you need to be killed right away.


Originally posted by ssewellusmc:
They are a spam tag. Ewpp doesn't apply to spam tags.


Originally posted by SAM_DANGER:
BRINGING IN AN UNTAGGED COUNTRY TO ASSIST IN THIS "EVEN FIGHT" IS SUPER CLASSY!

http://www.eestats.com/alliance/country/423


Originally posted by Soy Sauce:
Why are you picking on an old peaceful clan?


Originally posted by Suncrusher:
lame


+1

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 25th 2015, 20:33:18

Originally posted by Warster:
thats because the only attacking we do is retaling hits on us, otherwise we are all explore generally. But this isnt the first time Imag have done this to Monsters and im sure it wont be the last.


+1

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 25th 2015, 20:32:42

Originally posted by SAM_DANGER:
Seriously?

You think declaring a late war on an alliance that had never touched you will make more people want to play?

Pretty sure you're going to have the opposite effect.

SAM

DISCLAIMER: I can't seem to get a war report out of earthgraphs for this one, so I had to look at the Monsters countries individually on eestats, but I didn't see a single attack against imag before the Monsters were blindsided.


+1

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 22nd 2015, 11:14:58

Originally posted by mrcuban:
We had a dnh pact. We broke it with a single grab. We offered reps or drop def to take back land. Member took it before was arranged. We offer 120% L;L, MD have other policy and took PS. I contacted MD to discuss, its our policy vs their policy scenario. I think 120% was fair, they thought otherwise. We ROR'd to bring it back to 125% original grab which I thought was fair. MD did not and said they would take a futher 2 PS according to their policy. We disagreed. And hence our destruction.


I don't buy the "our policy vs their policy scenario" at all

You had a "dnh" pact and there would have been retal terms associated with that pact.

It's the terms outlined in the "dnh" pact policy that matter.

You attempted to offer reps, drop defence and offer 120% L:L to try and soften the retal blow against your offending country.

MD just took what they were intitled to under the pact terms and you had a little hissy fit.




Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 20th 2015, 12:31:08

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 20th 2015, 0:39:45

yes skiddmark......you'll come across many,many,many players like Number 4 that suffer from "small penis" complex and need to post/hide as a "New Member" to satisfy their pea brain ego

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 19th 2015, 12:35:18

Originally posted by Marshal:
if you want to learn game in peace then evo, laf, omega, md, icn, monsters..

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 15th 2015, 12:19:40

it's one player trash talking another player within a private in-game message

for all we know this player was just returning a reply that your player sent him

if you have a problem Blade....deal with SOF personally and keep this fluff off the AT boards.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 13th 2015, 2:04:45

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 10th 2015, 13:26:42

breeze is just a little drama queen kid in high heels

do us all a favor and stay the phu*k off AT

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 6th 2015, 1:46:09

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jul 3rd 2015, 8:32:48

it was a failed landgrab attempt.

retal it and move the game along without the drama

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jun 29th 2015, 1:30:05

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jun 22nd 2015, 12:28:45

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jun 15th 2015, 2:14:33

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jun 8th 2015, 2:12:36

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Jun 1st 2015, 11:21:21

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 26th 2015, 12:04:43

Originally posted by justtaint:
You've had ample opportunity to set the record straight, and yet all you've done is told the server that your policies trump signed pacts.

+1

you keep deflecting and refuse to explain to AT the real issue at hand and explain imag's actions. we're all still waiting to hear this from you breeze.

Originally posted by justtaint:
Vic.
Imag asked DK for a pact, DK said 200%L:L, imag agreed.
Imag hit DK, DK took 200%L:L (3 hits), imag killed the country

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 25th 2015, 1:09:23

Originally posted by ssewellusmc:
Originally posted by breeze:
So tag jumping is ok and allowed. First Ive heard it being ok?


I would worry about honoring pacts before you worry about an unwritten rule.

+1

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 24th 2015, 20:44:27

Originally posted by Duff:
your guy got his land back on the 1st 2 retals (all bar 1%) the 3rd was not needed took the the total way over the stips as you say


first off Duff I'm assuming you're referring to 80% land:land that every clan acknowledges except imag
that's acceptable for landgrabs that aren't topfeeds. The fact that 083 #416 grabbed a country with 185.0% more land than him ( a real schitthead move ) so when xxx #225 retalled twice for 79% as you indicated he most certainly deserves another retal.

but that's a mute point because there was a 200% land:land pact signed between the 2 alliances in question.....and I use the word "alliance" very loosely in describing what imag think they are.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 19th 2015, 20:46:10

Alliances show no mercy for the untagged player.

There's another post here on AT created by Hongda called [LaF FAs] where LaF basically did the same to his untagged country that MD did to yours

You are so right Incin.......fluff moves like MD and LaF just made are driving new players away from the game

Incin.....you're a very skilled veteran of this game......have some fun......start suiciding on a couple of them and when the alliance kills you off, take the generous restart resources and suicide another one of them and then another

They have to kill you and your restarts at least 3-4 times before your country is too small to do any further damage

Wait until LaF and MD are into a netting reset. This will hurt them the most

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 18th 2015, 2:33:58

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 11th 2015, 8:56:44

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 11th 2015, 0:23:04

Once again imag shows what a little bunch of turds they are

Originally posted by breeze:
Double tap and a 3rd hit in less than 24 hours from #225. Unacceptable


get your facts straight breeze before shooting off your stupid mouth

Originally posted by bstrong86:
5/8/2015 08:55:58 xxxx (#225) TDK O83 (#416) Imagnum PS 1183 Acres / + 658 Acres
5/7/2015 11:51:04 xxxx (#225) TDK O83 (#416) Imagnum PS 834 Acres / + 535 Acres
5/7/2015 11:46:55 xxxx (#225) TDK O83 (#416) Imagnum PS 1102 Acres / + 539 Acres
(Originalhit)5/6/2015 12:29:10 O83 (#416) Imagnum xxxx (#225) TDK PS 2446 Acres / + 1380 Acres


looks to me like #225 was just retalling the crowardly 85.9% topfeed grab from #416


Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 4th 2015, 2:15:42

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

May 1st 2015, 16:56:23

Originally posted by Vic:
all i know is, in all of my 29 years, i've both said "quarter of" and have heard it more times than i can count. thousands and thousands


I can honestly say I've never in all my life ever heard someone refer to time as quarter "OF" a particular hour. It's always been referred to as quarter "TO" a particular hour.

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Apr 27th 2015, 3:49:17

-A large, military laden, high networth country from clan "HAN" named "Farmer Boss # 89" triple taps an untag country named "fluffdisturber#132"

-"fluffdisturber#132" is too small to retal "Farmer Boss #89" so it proceeds to suicide on an innocent, treehugging, all-x country from clan "HAN"

-clan "HAN" kills "fluffdisturber#132"

"fluffditurber#132" restarts another country with 70% of it's resources from the killed country and suicides another innocent "HAN" country

-clan "Han" kills this restart

- and this goes on and on and on

That sums up the relationship between Alliance countries and untags in a nutshell

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Apr 27th 2015, 2:02:23

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Apr 25th 2015, 12:09:33

Originally posted by Riddler:
but then that punk #23 decides to triple and double tap other alliances to stay alive?


then let those other alliances kill him.....

Why centre only IMAG out in the subject of your post?

besides....when a country restarts with 70% of it's resources after being declared "dead" did you really kill it?
the proper term isn't "killed" or "dead" anymore.....it's "slowed him down just a tad" ;)

Edited By: Over The Hill on Apr 25th 2015, 12:44:33

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Apr 24th 2015, 3:45:04

I guess that punk #23 took offence to being quad-tapped by that punk #42

Apr 13/15 2:11:47 PM SS Wind Blower (#42) (iMagNum) Geronimo Stilton (#23) () 19 A (+21 A)
Apr 13/15 2:11:41 PM SS Wind Blower (#42) (iMagNum) Geronimo Stilton (#23) () 21 A (+28 A)
Apr 13/15 2:11:35 PM SS Wind Blower (#42) (iMagNum) Geronimo Stilton (#23) () 21 A (+28 A)
Apr 13/15 2:11:30 PM SS Wind Blower (#42) (iMagNum) Geronimo Stilton (#23) () 21 A (+30 A)

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Apr 20th 2015, 13:47:34

bonus

Over The Hill Game profile

Member
509

Apr 17th 2015, 3:16:13


Originally posted by ronald6abueva:
+10%( as said to increase chances)


If you only send an additional 10% you'll bounce more grabs than win

Send a minimum of 20% more .....you might even want to consider sending 25%...besides you pick up more ghost acres by over sending more