Until last round I hadn't run turns anywhere in over 3 years. You guys been having fun in the IMP tag without me and without me even knowing the past couple years? Jerks

Still <3 you whooze

I did? Is that you calling me late every night and hanging up?

https://youtube.com/...Td6Vv-Vvn58?feature=share

I vote we call it one's Safe Space

Or days/weeks by my observations in most cases, if they ever actually stop at all.

I see you didn't get beyond the first sentence.

Random question: Were you one of those children that had to receive a gift of your own during another kid's birthday party?

Try just for a moment to assume that you might be incorrect here. I know that may be hard for you to grasp but just take a moment and entertain the idea of the possibility.



This is completely false. I think what you're trying to say is there is absolutely nothing you can do right that second to fulfill the urge for revenge. But it actually doesn't take that long if you will take the time to read the advice that others have already stated (and I'm sure stated more than once when you brought this up the last time). It's clear that you did not take their advice and are still looking for an actual change in the game coding to appease what you want to do in that exact moment rather than just learning how to respond in these situations yourself armed with a bit of knowledge from more experienced players.




Humanitarian rules in the game benefit both sides equally in my opinion. I don't see how they lean one side over another when everyone has to play by those rules and everyone has the opportunity to place themselves on either side of that coin each round. In most situations like this, i'm guessing any attack you would be able to send if humanitarians allowed you would result in DH, so getting your land back the moment you login and see the hits is unlikely. That means you're looking for access to harmful spyops and missiles, which only reinforces the suggestion you're seeking change to support a more lazy play style rather than putting in the effort and being patient enough to do what many others already do - sell stockpiles, buy military to get in range, unleash.




But you are asking for special rules to appease you and maybe a couple others that are either too lazy to do the work to achieve the same outcome, or too stubborn to allow someone to teach you how to play better.



Can you blame them? You ignored the advice you were given the last time and still haven't learned how to counter. Why wouldn't they keep doing it?



I'm sure Requiem read your post and understood it just fine. You're just not willing to accept an alternative other than being catered to. He gave you good advice. Try to consider the possibility that maybe the opportunity for improvement might need to start on your end. People keep telling you the same thing - maybe there's a decent reason

Someone lied to you.

This takes a small amount of time and what I think he's hoping for is an immediate solution to his knee-jerk reaction after logging in.

The game has the bots now tag as Live Operational Computer (LOC) in FFA

I can't think of anything within the game itself that prevents anyone from doing this.

8 players, 256 countries

So you're wanting to remove ads...the only small source of income this free game has... but you want to remove them without paying for Premium to remove them?

Who claimed you had free speech in the first place?

Is there something happening in 2032 I'm not aware of yet? Why am I dying?

My favorite part of this story is the final chapter.

If? You both did run two.

Not allowed! GRIEFER!!! Everyone huck squirrels at him and call him names!

You have to send payment directly to me for immediate credits. We'll add this to the future tutorial

But did he get their expressed written permission to enter their ingame safe-space?

But can we put them in the stockade and hurl moldy vegetables at them?

Dried corn cobs were once used as a form of toilet paper

Raz has always been a middle-tier player on his best day. Go ahead and offer him an even shot at this duel you're proposing and just make it 2 vs 1 lol

Ok, I'll bite. You don't actually believe this, right? I cant speak for the who, what, and why with IMP and crew after my departure but since we're talking about really old stuff still here (your favorite), I felt it necessary to swing in and call your bullfluff.

I feel like you know better and this is just your usual M.O. of spreading propaganda and misinformation for the boards and the poor souls that take the time to read your drivel. Maybe stick to the present situation so I dont have to keep typing the same thing about hostilities from a year ago just to appease your attention requirement for the week.

Skynet: Did you not ask permission before engaging in war with another clan? I'm telling

+1

In all fairness, he could have been referring to about 4 or 5 different people in this thread.

And somehow you still miss the point, Derrick.

Fixed it for you.



Perhaps initially but history in this game has shown us a few times that this sort of play style is not very sustainable long-term. Eventually people tend to somehow gravitate to being reasonable and adapting in order to move forward.

Imaging clans forming reasonable retal policies again that suit their needs but also contribute to generating land in the game. Imagine attacking real players again without being considered a suicider or some other fabricated word created in an entirely different game. Imagine clan leaders engaging in real diplomacy with each other to establish appropriate policies and alliances/pacts that actually matter. Craziness!




Do you really think this is foresight? Is your ego so large that for some reason you think you were the only, or one of the few people, that have thought of the type of playstyle you're threatening? When you're done patting yourself on the back for an accomplishment that you invented, come back down to earth and consider that you may not have had a unique thought. Perhaps the opposition you're seeing is for a different reason.

I support bots retalling in FFA

Yeah, players whould be able to cash, buy, stock and repeat with no variance or obstacles. Earthquakes are just as bad as players hitting real players ingame. The land players get from bots is rightfully yours and nobody should have the right to challenge that - and the game should not be allowed to remove hard earned buildings, regardless of event ratio affecting all players equally. ITS MINE!
If anyone disagrees then you dont play to win and break records and you're a griefer.

If you thought the earthquake complaints were numerous, just wait until Fuzzy Wardrobe and Captain Jack Silverblade start not only retaliating, but also tossing nukes for retals on PS :-D

I support.

I feel like some people expect to fail almost never *shrug*. I guess its important if you're tech stealing.

I see a bit of opportunity here for tag switch exploitation for both users and non-users of this function if joins and departs are not restricted. If they are restricted, it introduces it's own separate issues

Taking anything from other players is not allowed and you should be publicly shamed. Perhaps a new list in the Leaderboards section to identify all the players that interact ingame with other players without asking their permission first. I have a Mehul-given right to my land, sir.

Countries in tags that select that option for the round could also have the "War Room" replaced with "Crops Room" or "The Barn". Similar setup but comes with Planters, tractors, Cultivators, Combines.

But after a player joins their safe space will I still be able to visit their farm and comment on their crops?

This thread caught fire quickly. Smores, anyone?

This game interacts with other players, which includes being attacked.

You're a few weeks late

That club is growing fast

I haven't missed watering my crops all week and not one "friend" has commented on my farm.