Verified:

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Aug 22nd 2017, 22:17:22

Originally posted by Mr Gainsboro:
avoiding me cause you know its true, go create country and win


I've made the mistake of being bated into playing again before -_-

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Aug 20th 2017, 19:06:11

Originally posted by iScode:
Originally posted by SolidSnake:
Originally posted by Mr Gainsboro:
you should come back and play, we need the competition :)


But when I'm tier 1 and the next best tier is 6th-7th, how is it competition were I to play again?



You are like tier 12 in the new, warring laf.

I got tier 1 all sewed up!


Just no.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Aug 20th 2017, 19:04:53

Originally posted by King_Cobra1:
Hey now SolidSnake there is a new up and coming tier 1 so called protege named Gerdler that thinks he is up to your level. It will be an interesting reset to see where he would match up with the best of the best. How can he prove himself without the old guard showing what it really takes?

but, don't look at me . I just start trouble.


This gerdler fellow sounds like farmland.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Aug 19th 2017, 21:25:36

Originally posted by Mr Gainsboro:
you should come back and play, we need the competition :)


But when I'm tier 1 and the next best tier is 6th-7th, how is it competition were I to play again?

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Aug 16th 2017, 20:22:32

Evo still suck

#Evo#Suck#foreversucky#Oldnews

Can't believe this game is still going though!

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Feb 18th 2017, 11:16:29

Evo suck.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 8th 2016, 8:21:09

Who cares you're all fluff anyway.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Sep 24th 2016, 15:03:04

Fine I admit it. I aided sov.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 6th 2016, 22:28:41

Originally posted by Pang:
Seriously, SS, no one cared about you enough to give out your country #. I certainly didn't, I doubt anyone else did either.

While you were typically trying to slam the admins for being corrupt (at least you're now willing to admit you were wrong on some of those charges) we were actually focused on running the game. Take off your tinfoil hat, anything the admins did to you was not an abuse of game admin privileges.

Giving out your country # wasn't worth the risk of losing admin access for doing it. Plain and simple. Especially at a time we were all happy to be working on new features.


Pang you even admitted at the time he likely did it, when 0 people know i'm playing, and my country gets leaked, there aren't many options really.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 5th 2016, 19:40:55

Originally posted by Slagpit:
Running away with your tail between your legs is fine too. You brought me into this thread by talking fluff and dropping my name, but now you're whining because I'm asking you hypothetical questions? Poor baby. Go back to your echo chamber where you can relive your "glory days". Much more comfortable than doing any critical thinking, I'm sure.


I'm running away by continuing to reply, note taken.
I dropped 20 names, you just happened to be one of the ones i was legitimately calling fluff as opposed to the ones i was joking about.
You haven't asked me any questions unless you consider "who gives a fluff about a country number" a question directed at me, despite it coming across as rhetorical. Which if it was, my answer would be, no one unless it results in getting suicided. That said, it's not a hypothetical question so my question to you would be, when writing on the forums, do you deliberately post random sentences as a troll or do you actually believe what you're saying to be true? Because if it's a troll it's top notch because you've built a persona literally over a decade that makes the troll believable hence making it a good troll. But personally I think it's far more likely a continuation in the decade of bollocks you spew that is either just wrong or makes no sense so as not to be able to even begin discerning if it is wrong or not.


Originally posted by Slagpit:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
That's why Evo failed, mrford

It was full of emo losers like fagpit, kj and nukevil who would rather whine and cry foul than actually try to be competitive at literally anything

An alliance consisting of members with such a loser attitude was bound to fail sooner or later


In this very thread SS said that he didn't see any point in trying to compete partially because "the admins would just tell everyone that i run the country to get me suicided anyway so what's the point."

Are you really this stupid or is it an act?

For the record, I spent the majority of my time working on the actual game instead of evo. Nukevil spent a bunch of time coding the forums that you're now using to attack him. Again, are you really this stupid or is it an act?


I said that if I netgained untagged the admins would give my number out, as has happened in the past. To be honest I dont know how much weight i even hold to that assertion given how little anyone cares about the game anymore, but the one time I did I got screwed, so that's the only information I have to go off.

Since reading and comprehension doesn't appear to be your strong suit I feel like addressing any more posts to you is likely a waste of time.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 4th 2016, 23:18:03

You say you want an honest discussion but continue to lie hence why I edited out a paragraph I'm not even going to reply to anymore since what's the point? You literally haven't spoken of any real events except to deny ones that actually took place. Real honest discussion...

You're replying to a thread that is quite literally about me, if your referencing other people, say so. Or just keep slandering me behind the cover of referring to groups of players.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 4th 2016, 20:28:43

Originally posted by Slagpit:
It's not a funny story. You just made it up. Since you want to hear funny stories I'll tell you one. Back when the game was still new a certain alliance accused the admins of changing the game rules to penalize them and to benefit someone else. We were still trying to be good game stewards back then so we did a full investigation. It turned out that the game functioned exactly how the alliance thought it used to work. Nothing was changed. The guy who failed a grab just did the math wrong. At the time I didn't realize that was the first in a string of hundreds of similarly baseless accusations from a loud-mouthed, destructive group of players.

On the subject of cheating, some players seem to have the idea that as long as you don't run multies anything that you do in the game or on the forums is okay. Not running multies is the bare minimum. There are many different types of cheating in this game. Some range from extremely destructive to arguably beneficial. There are also many different ways that players can interact with the community. Some of them are extremely destructive. It used to be disappointing to see the pride that some players take in being so destructive.


Um ok? I don't remember ever suggesting anything about attack formulas that was wrong, dr formulas were wrong which I told you and provided evidence of but you know... why would you listen to me it's not like I knew anything about the game or anything.

There aren't really many different types of cheating, there are things within the game rules and things outside the game rules. There is unethical gameplay i.e. sending spies into other alliances, and things of that sort granted that was once common place again it was something I never did. If you think my time playing the game was destructive by positioning laf to the in the best possible place then I'd say you and me have differing views on what the game is.

My douchyness was political and grew my alliance (we went from what 4-5th? best alliance to the top alliance in the game both netgaining and warring, without anyone really close)
Your (and anon/kj can get grouped into this as well) douchyness was out of being sour with no thought to the impact it would have on your alliance, and took evo from a 70 odd member alliance with a relatively high standard to a tag that I wouldn't trust to beat a spam tag in a war.

You really want to argue I was destructive by warring you once and then giving you a three reset pact? Granted I ran a few more wars after that, but they were wars you got yourselves in while I was completely away from politics, that was just for the enjoyment of hearing your whine.

The people that destroyed the game were the ones thrust into leadership due to a lack of alternatives that didn't know how to run an alliance, and those that while capable were too bull headed to compromise for the benefit of their alliances. At least from when I last played LaF/SoF was the last power coalition, the fact that they ran the game for so long without much competition reflects badly on the people leading the rest of the server rather than the policies laf/sof undertook.


Edited By: SolidSnake on Jun 4th 2016, 20:33:57
See Original Post

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 4th 2016, 0:00:06

Originally posted by Pang:
Originally posted by Forgotten:

EVO's hosted on the same server. You hacked the game.

HLW was given access by a former dev, he didn't hack game and got lynched.

You hacked the game server and the admins didn't say anything.

Gee.


Actually, TC stole DB credentials he shouldn't have had access to by crawling a bunch of files that were poorly protected on the server's file system. Hanlong abused it instead of alerting me to it, as someone who professed to be looking out for the best interests of the game wouldn't do. Both are in the fluffbooks for that but we don't need to rehash that again.

I don't care what Evo admins did to their own site. It was theirs to do what they wanted with it. If they ever did it to Boxcar, that would have been tantamount to doing it to the game.


If fairness I probably owe you an apology over that seeing as I went off on you in defense of them for what turned out to be true.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 23:56:57

Originally posted by archaic:
Originally posted by Vic:
Hands down best thread on the forum right now


Not anymore . . . between slaggy making an appearance to feed even more of his tears to the game, and SS still denying that he was running a network of suiciders against EVO and PDM, and now we've dragged TC and HLW back out of the cubbard.

The 'History' of netting is all we get to talk about now, because Laf ran every tag that tried to compete with them out of the game either as a deliberate FR policy or by outright blatant cheating. Now they reign supreme over a server of 426 tired grumpy old men. Congrats, GG


Still denying I ran a network of suiciders? I was never even accused of that before, but for what it's worth I never ran a network of suiciders against pdm or evo. Dont get me wrong I was told of the odd suicider hitting before they did but I assume thats just because people knew I didnt like you so it was a way to brag.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 23:38:38

Originally posted by Slagpit:
You're still posting about me. You're still obsessed. You're talking about all of this stuff like I remember it or like it matters. But okay, go ahead. Present your evidence that I leaked your country number or whatever you think I did. Don't post paragraphs of irrelevant bullfluff. Just stick to the evidence.


It doesn't matter, my whole post stated it doesn't matter anymore hence why i asked why you bother lying about it anymore. I'm more than open about how i messed with evo and essentially turned you from neutral to enemy because i didn't like your leaders and to avoid more damaging wars with ix, wog, sol and sof. It's been what 8-9 years since I was don? They are just funny stories now rather than having any impact on the game.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 23:29:56

Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
SS:

Reignz and Doll were cheating? That changes my perspective and how I rank them.


To be fair to doll, im not certain he was, but reignz yes.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 18:10:21

Originally posted by archaic:
I realize this has turned into a Laf circle jerk of nerdity, but is a discussion about best ever that does not include dragon really valid? In addition to his abilities as a warroom leader, his walling has literally turned the tides of war back when wars were really wars. Its a two sided coin - excluding 50% of the game play from the discussion seems hollow.

Also, FWIW, if you add up the collective NW of non-laf people that were taught basic netting skills by the likes of En4, DDan, Raheel, NiteL, oldman, etc - you would have an awful lot of NW over the last 15 years.


Realistically the reason I dont rank dragon is because dragon performed against fluff players. Being a breaker against war alliances isnt that hard... If dragon had a standout war performance against people like eug, chun, xin then I would have ranked him higher, but the fact is vs those guys he would never be considered a breaker all he did was wall, which granted his walling was top notch, but as far as wars go you can be a finisher all reset, you're not winning your alliance anything. I think given enough focus and exposure to top tier players he would have matched them, but he just didnt have the exposure to know what to improve in SoL and probably never really cared as he seemed pretty content just being the best of the warmongers.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 17:59:47

Or maybe you'd rather talk about how you hacked the AT archive to get backdoor access into the database and track who ran what country when rival went from an alliance to untagged suiciding.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 17:51:48

Originally posted by SolidSnake:
Originally posted by Pang:
lol

there were always 2 camps in LaF: those who thought SS' ego was overblown in one camp and SS in the other

glad to see he's still doing that whine-bragging thing like I remember!


Ego and choosing not to be modest are two different things. There's an element of truth and an element of trolling to most of what I post on AT, isn't the latter what AT is for?

And for those of us that played long enough to remember when you actually played and quite openly claimed to be gods gift to FR it's really quite amusing to reference my ego. My assertions are based on legitimate understanding of the game and skill in playing it. I wonder if I'd get banned if I posted what things you did back when you did actually play. I assume I would, don't think you'd be able to take the bruise to your ego.
Originally posted by Pang:
haha SS never changes....

Whine-bragging like usual, then answering his own questions about my intentions + threats about outing me for things I'd actually love to talk about :p I don't talk about them as a courtesy to the others that were involved -- you're in that group too, SS. :)

For the record, and as I said last time SS made this threat, I'm more than happy to talk about anything I ever did while playing. From writing bots to market manipulation to special access I honestly don't care. I moved on from playing to leading to hosting admin to game admin over like a 17 year period and my attitude toward the game evolved as my role did. The petty fluff that I used to get so involved over makes me laugh today at how dumb it was. I'm glad you're still able to cling to those accomplishments like a badge of honor.


I'm part of that group? Name anything I ever did that was outside of the games rules, literally anything. I plotted and manipulated the same way that anyone did, but the difference between me and you was I never cheated.

You want to talk about stuff, lets talk about why you were went from head fr to excluded from all leadership discussions when I became don. How many countries were you running in e2025 under singapore ip addresses along with reignz and doll under the guise of safe list? My memory says 17 but I could be out a few.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 3rd 2016, 17:45:25

Originally posted by Slagpit:
What does that have to do with people falsely accusing the mods and admins of being corrupt?


It's been a lifetime since my beef with you existed, why still bother to even lie about it anymore it's not like it has any impact on current game play. I know what you did, you know what you did, pang knows what you did, qzjul knows what you did, granted of those only i accused you of using database access to give out my country number and pang admitted you likely did it but wouldn't take any action regardless.

I dont deny knowing about suicides on evo before they happened, i never sponsored them in spite of "proof" being posted that I aided someone by nukevil? (I want to say nuke though it could have been that fluff ex ix then rival guy sanjivaiafsdaf or whatever his name was?) which when proved his math didnt add up simply suggested that I was so good at hiding it that I changed my nw change to 0 (which granted if I did sponsor a suicide I would be that good as to not have a nw change but still could up with a better explanation than that), but when people told me you were going to be suicided I gave 0 fluffs.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 2nd 2016, 21:54:21

Originally posted by Forgotten:
SS, I may have had good shot winning this set, that should be enough motivation for you to come back and put me in my place, but then again, I know my place, maybe that's not motivating enough for you.

FORGO IS BETTER THAN SS.

Is that better?


Forgo for rank 1! I'm joining the bandwagon.

Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
I think what hurts the most about pulling the trigger on my destock a day late(trying to give myself the shot at NW record) is more that I may miss beating SS's techer record. I should have blown past that, while playing on my phone mostly living in hotels... and from what enshula and en4cer say, your set was better for techers

;-)


I honestly don't even remember anything about that reset except that enshula had a good country and everyone else sucked. That said a brief look at your country op says your country was typical good t3 contending techer at turn 1200, but nothing to write home about. Still, enjoy that failed destock for old times sake!

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 2nd 2016, 21:36:13

Originally posted by NukEvil:
So you're saying that Evo's cheating didn't get the rules of the game changed--Rockman's action in sniffing out/responding to the cheating were so bad that the rules of the game were changed to stop him from doing it again?

#Icandothisallday


From memory rockman ran harmful opps eos on qzjul to cost him a t10? He got mad and opened up country news of all countries to the public as a backlash and way to prove rockman did it, we all lol'd at evo.

It was the mod-abuse that previously had been slagpit's forte that was repeatedly ignored with no action being taken which is essentially the same as encouraging it to continue, I suppose it wasn't technically cheating though as they make the rules.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 2nd 2016, 21:32:08

Originally posted by Requiem:
Originally posted by Rockman:
...But I don't think that "best" is the appropriate word for that.


I'll be the judge of that! I was just showing you some love I didn't actually think you are better than SS. Sorry :D


There are certainly aspects of the game that rockman is better than me and most people at. I think there were a few people like Xin, enshula, rockman, TC to an extent, that were significantly better making small optimizations than almost anyone i knew.

Like developing the cash start up that changed tax every other turn to maximize income/pop by turn 120 or whatever it was. Rockman is just very modest and never really bothered grabbing, without grabbing you dont get top ranks, that's not to say you don't have the most efficient country though.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 2nd 2016, 21:26:11

Originally posted by Pang:
lol

there were always 2 camps in LaF: those who thought SS' ego was overblown in one camp and SS in the other

glad to see he's still doing that whine-bragging thing like I remember!


Ego and choosing not to be modest are two different things. There's an element of truth and an element of trolling to most of what I post on AT, isn't the latter what AT is for?

And for those of us that played long enough to remember when you actually played and quite openly claimed to be gods gift to FR it's really quite amusing to reference my ego. My assertions are based on legitimate understanding of the game and skill in playing it. I wonder if I'd get banned if I posted what things you did back when you did actually play. I assume I would, don't think you'd be able to take the bruise to your ego.

Edited By: SolidSnake on Jun 2nd 2016, 21:41:11

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

May 31st 2016, 20:27:44

Oh damn. RIP DD, you'll be sorely missed.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

May 31st 2016, 20:18:53

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

May 31st 2016, 20:17:41

I guess it is debatable, it would be between hao, chun, eug, enshula, xin, bakku, hlw, samxz and me I would say and it's pretty interchangable by reset and what style suited the reset, some had an aggressive risk taking like me some were more about maximizing what you have like enshula. And yes they are all ex laf but at the moment I cant think of a person outside of laf that I ever was concerned about beating me to rank 1, not saying that no one ever got close, just that no one else was consistently good they would just have the odd good reset or some form of aid, free land, etc.

That said the skill level has decreased pretty drastically any newb can fart on a keyboard and get a t10 these days.

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
I think many have him beat by a long shot. We rarely see him around anymore. But when we do, he's always talking about how he's so much better than everyone else. I think if he came back now he would be blown away. Who is the best netter of all time?


As far as all that, you cant antagonize me into playing again, you'd have to be a far better player that i have a actual disdain for to get me to play again, like maybe if pang wanted to netgain against me or slagpit, though neither of them are any good neither I didn't like them more than I don't like you, not to say I don't like you, I don't like you, but I also have not got a clue who you are.
I've won the last 3 times I've netgained, get 5 good players to play and i'd consider playing, right now the only challenge I can legitimately see would be trying to go untagged all set to win, and the admins would just tell everyone that i run the country to get me suicided anyway so what's the point.

P.S.
The following people suck
Pang
Slagpit
Tan (I cant remember if you'd changed your name to something else, but if you have add that name to this list too)
Vic
Lord Travana
Nukevil
Vic (Again)
Forgo
Everyone that ever thought evo were good
Everyone that was ever a leader in evo
Everyone that doesnt know how much of a tool slagpit was (is?)
Vic (Again)
Most of PDM
iScode
Vic (Again)
and Syko_Killa

(I'm sure I missed out a few people, so feel free to add to the list).

Edited By: SolidSnake on May 31st 2016, 20:30:12

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Apr 9th 2016, 19:22:25

fluffing laf and their spreadsheets.

Tripple crown has always been anw,total nw and total members, the three ways which alliances are ranked in game.

In the mean time I'd like to take this time to congratulate myself, for another reset of not playing passing, and still being the best player to have ever played EE.

Congrats.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 24th 2016, 23:21:13

Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Also, to elucidate on why Conor had an awful strategy against Diaz

-Conor doesn't have blinding sledgehammer power. He hits hard but relies more on timing to hit his opponent when they don't see it coming, and volume to make his opponents give up. Shots you don't see coming hurt you and knock you out far easier than shots you've braced for. What made the Aldo KO so crushing was the combination of Jose moving in aggressively with his chin up, and not seeing the counter

-you aren't going to break a Diaz with volume.
- despite being hittable the diaz's both have fantastic boxing fundamentals. They see the shots coming and are aware when they are about to be hit

The only way Conor beats Nate(other than a well timed shot although he cannot plan to rely on that) is by out pointing him with movement similar to condit vs Nick.

I don't know f Conor will concede his ego to follow that approach


Nate is bigger than conor but neither should fight 170 unless everyone is fighting at natural weight, that said nate is a bigger 155 than Conor. If you look at nates face after the fight conor has big power, I think it was more that nate was parrying alot of his strikes before they landed because of his reach for conor to land he was winging overhand lefts and catching arm before his punch would land.

For Conor to beat Diaz he has to use his kicking game and only box when nate rushes him. Which is entirely possible for him to do, but he would have to give up trying to win every fight by KO.

I think I'd have Conor as favourite over Franky and Aldo tbh (maybe that's a big of wishful thinking on my part, but if I put money down it would be on Conor), just because franky's chin isnt great, he just recovers fast, but if he gets hit with one clean shot from Conor he's going down.

Honestly I think he'd KO ferguson and alvarez. Ferguson would try and trade with him or go for a roll into a double leg or leg lock and against someone with the reaction speed of conor he'd get ko'd, the guy is in a vulnerable position 50% of the time in his fights, it's just he's unpredictable so people aren't reacting like they should. Dont get me wrong he's exciting to watch, but I dont rate his skill set very highly, I think nermi will mangle him even after two years out. Alvarez is just mediocrity personified, I think pettis just didnt expect him to go all out grind like he did, but if they rematched I'd have pettis all day.

Even RDA, I reckon Conor could KO him, it's just he has to do it quickly because if he grapples at all he's going to the mat, and if it hits the mat he's getting subbed.

Also if Nermi stays healthy long enough to fight for the title, he's gonna smash RDA all over again.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 24th 2016, 19:28:35

Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
I looked through the member list and I don't know who Syko_killa is, no one under that name

BTW to change topic, SS please tell me you aren't a Conor McGregor fan? Friends I otherwise consider to be intelligent, rational people- engineers usually capable fo decent thought- have become enamored with the man simply because he's Irish(they're all from Galway). Please tell me the sphere of influence from the little man's annoying diatribes hasn't spread across into the UK?


You're aware I'm irish right?
I'm a massive Conor fan, I'm not deluded into thinking he's p4p best or any crazyness like that, but he's engaging, and his stand up is very high level and more than anything it's exciting, the Aldo KO was insanity, I think it's probably KO i've watched the most in my lifetime. If you dont like his antics fair enough, but it's what makes his fights the most watched fights since Lesnar and you cant hate on him making money and growing the sport.

Truthfully I think he can beat anyone at 145. But I also think Aldo and Edger could beat him (though I don't think either of them could stand with him and avoid getting KO'd). At 155 I think he beats half the t10 loses to half of them (nermi would be a horror match up for him). And 170 is just stupid.

All that said, he is one of maybe 2-3? fighters that I want to see no matter who he fights which given how few fights he has in the ufc is pretty impressive.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 22nd 2016, 22:27:14

Originally posted by Dissident:
Elvesrus
Vamps
Dragon
Raging budda
Aznize
Buch
Kingcobra
Link
Evo Rasp
ICN Rasp

Need i go on?


I'd take vamps and dragon of the early 00's, the rest are tiers 10 and bellow...

And for old times sake, Evo Rasp is especially fluffe.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 22nd 2016, 22:24:09

Originally posted by Dissident:
I know. We are a landmark tag! Join us!


Originally posted by SolidSnake:

Additional tour dates are available upon request and sufficient demand shown in the form of ticket sales via paypal, $1200 per reset (Absolute bargin price of $20/day).


That's my fee, and when you break that down per day i'm still honestly not sure those 5 minutes a day would be worth it to me.

That aside, without knowing who elders are, or who plays in them, knowing how I ranked players ability, the chances any of them even are on par with tier 9 Vic is not high. And he's tier 9...

Edited By: SolidSnake on Mar 22nd 2016, 22:28:48
See Original Post

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 22nd 2016, 22:17:22

Originally posted by Dissident:
Thats not true. Elders has at least 10 decent players


There hasn't been 10 decent players playing the game at the same time in over a decade.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 22nd 2016, 22:08:35

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
I hear all these challengers talking about how they could out-do landtraders. Well, why don't you come back and prove it. Because in case you havn't noticed we have a server who have been attempting to do just that by hitting untags and land-bots and I gaurantee that they will get nowhere near a top ten. But could make a top 100.


Let me introduce myself, I'm SS, the greatest player (yes player, not just netgianer) to ever play ee (bar one or two but lets not talk about them!). I have already done all the above in a 1 set only comeback tour (see link) http://www.earthempires.com/alliance/35/ranks
Additional tour dates are available upon request and sufficient demand shown in the form of ticket sales via paypal, $1200 per reset (Absolute bargin price of $20/day).

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
Vamps, you will have to speak with En4cer if you'd like to set something up. The machine is a little rusty, but all we need is some oil. Don't think that i'm not a seasoned warrior in this game myself. Not too mention that the entire clan is very good at building great countries and stocking plenty of resources. If you think your group are the only one's your wrong. I have hundreds of millions in stock right now and I could easily break down any country in your clan if I chose to war, but my sights are set on achieving something different right now. I would very much like to be a part next sets war against you and if LaF decides to net, I will join a clan for a set that will war you. We will have our fun after this reset is over. I promise.


Where to begin! I think I need to break down how what you write is perceived by the greater AT audience, as most people here been here for well over a decade.

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
The machine is a little rusty, but all we need is some oil.


Translation: We (whoever the machine is?) are fluff.

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
Don't think that i'm not a seasoned warrior in this game myself. Not too mention that the entire clan is very good at building great countries and stocking plenty of resources.


Translation: I'm a newb, a big'ol newb. Farm me! Farm me!

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
If you think your group are the only one's your wrong. I have hundreds of millions in stock right now and I could easily break down any country in your clan if I chose to war, but my sights are set on achieving something different right now.


Translation: I have created a tag called spamtag123, the password is 123. Join us and you can be our head FR! Other positions available include, Head IA, Head of War and Division Leader! Don't delay, join today!

Originally posted by Syko_Killa:
I would very much like to be a part next sets war against you and if LaF decides to net, I will join a clan for a set that will war you. We will have our fun after this reset is over. I promise.


Translation: [internal monologue] I take this game far far too seriously considering no one good plays anymore, maybe I should pay that SS guy money via paypal to teach me and then I can dominate?!?! [/end internal monologue]

---------------------------------------------

It's actually just occurred to me at the end of all this, that it sounds like you're from LaF. In which case, you should be ashamed of yourself, because you make LaF sound fluff, and without knowing much of its current state i'd still wager it's probably the only alliance left with at least one or two decent players.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Mar 20th 2016, 20:39:11

1:
Hi Vamps!

2:
Originally posted by Vic:
all i know is i've never land traded and i'm a still a boss and all the laf guys know if i desired to land trade, which i've never done, it would become a question of who was going for 2nd and 3rd place ... but I'll take 1st non land trader and actually be able to sleep at night :p


You are not "a boss". You have never been "a boss". All the laf guys know you will never be "a boss".
You're a ninth tier netgainer that struggles to maintain your ranking in the ninth tier despite having being able to ask all the best netgainers to have ever played the game for advise.

3:
Originally posted by enshula:

i think ss as well might have worked it out before i told him, and xin probably would have as well if he was more active at that point

Na I'm pretty sure by the time I played a reset oil destocking had been around for at least a few resets and I only played once while it's been an option.

4:
As far as all this trading stuff goes, it's lame as fluff but so is the game these days so I guess it's fitting. That said, hardly anyone good plays anymore anyway so if you're worth your salt, no matter what inter/intra trading anyone else is doing, you can beat them, but then I suppose that goes back to hardly anyone good playing anymore, so actually you need the one or two people that vaguely know what they're doing to stop playing.

5:
For what it's worth, I quite enjoyed reading this thread. It's nice to see people argue and troll each other on here, whether people agree with it or not, it's what made the game good in the first place.

Edited By: SolidSnake on Mar 20th 2016, 20:41:25
See Original Post

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Nov 8th 2015, 16:11:01

Originally posted by tellarion:

Because it breaks down what little semblance of competition and skill there was left, that's why. Yes, I agree that people from two tags trading their break information freely, without using ops, and manipulating their NWs in order for both sides to benefit is basically the same thing. That's why I wasn't really in favor of doing it that way. I preferred to have an open list system which was basically restricted grabbing. People who don't want to be grabbed are exempt, and everyone else is fair game, within reason(meaning you can't get hit a ridiculous number of times in a short window).

Evo did it this way for years with PDM before it really started to spread(that set laf and rd went fkn nuts and broke all sorts of records). Both sides benefitted, but usually one side understood the math and formulas better, and were able to manipulate it to come out further ahead. That is still competitive without being complete assholes to the other side, and it allows the all-x people to net in peace.

But I digress. This style has slowly been dying off as people go for the more efficient method of hand-holding. Intra-tag trading is just the next logical step...


I won last set without landtrading... And with the exception of enshula (laf), no one was even close.

Landtrading at all is copping out of netgaining competitively, but if people are going to accept it as a form of netgaining, I dont really see why laf should penalise themselves by having to trade with people less skilled so reducing their own gains and thus their own networths, as opposed to everyone else getting to trade with higher skilled players, optimising their gains.

All that said, if I was still leading/playing in laf landtrading at all would be outlawed and most of the alliances on the server would be farm land, there would be wars for reasons, and everyone would be entirely more butthurt. But that's just how I liked to play the game.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 9th 2015, 16:29:22

And yeah i'm a fluff that plays once every 10-15 resets but at least i'm honest about the state of the server rather than patting people on the back for being fluff.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 9th 2015, 16:28:07

Because even in the game's hayday 99% of anyone playing in war tags, sucked at warring.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 9th 2015, 16:27:07

Yeah but, if netgaining is this easy, warring is only going to be easier...

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 9th 2015, 16:09:35

Meh I won without trading and fluffing up more times than I can count.

http://www.earthempires.com/leaderboards?type=13

Considering I've traded once ever, and that was years ago to prove a point the land traders suck, what the actual fluff. And maybe im being a fluff but where are the good netgainers, the game's a joke these days.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 7th 2015, 13:55:27

I've read a lot of threads on AT over the last 15 odd years that are a damning indictment of the intelligence of people that post on AT, but this might just take the biscuit.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 5th 2015, 14:03:45

You're not just a racist, you're a fluffing idiot too.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Oct 3rd 2015, 23:27:39

Impossiburrr

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Sep 24th 2015, 10:22:48

Flamey?

If it is flamey, you suck. And if it's not flamey, you still suck.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Sep 19th 2015, 0:06:18

18/15 23:53:00 Bushels 119,021,476 @ $5 = $595,107,380

how mad is that guy....