Pics or get the fluff off this board with this crap!

TROLL BETTER, SUICIDE ON EVO!

+1

"Irrational unstable leadership" we need look no further then Laf, your Head FA is the person who committed the acts of hostility and you now expect Neo to interact with him an allow him to negotiate the reps?

Laf still hasn't learnt, you don't run this server anymore, your threats of WAR are just that. Laf can't take out single man suicider's you expect people to believe you can beat a coordinated alliance?

LOL. You're a funny guy! When has Laf won a set without interfering with Evo, PDM, Monsters, Omega? NEVER, Laf has won with mass FA and harmful spy ops on top ten countries that aren't tagged Laf. Making the claim for an individual from Laf being the best, invalid.

Liar!

Another dense idiot.

Blind faith in your leaders, or in anything, will get you killed.

-Bruce Springsteen

Wrong! Omega is who the disgruntled Laffers will "grief" to try prove their point.

1. Top Tier WHINERS. As well all know, the Squeaky wheel gets the oil.

2. You will be taught, to try too hold land with minimum defense. PRO TIP: This doesn't work.

3. They debate the lyrical value of Taylor Swift vs Justin Bieber. YOU TOO CAN BELIBE!!!

Neal how does this differ to Laffers making multiple posts whining about rule changes?Laffers are trolling equally as bad an are not adding to the conversation either. Every argument presented to Laf has been ignored and blamed on game mechanics.



+1 archaic

Might be time for Laffers to heed their own advice. If your alliance can't protect you and your land its time to leave. Join an alliance that can, its what you've been telling the rest of us to do for years.

Pretty sure Omega, TIE, EVO, TPA, PDM, SOL, MD, SoF and a host of other alliances would be happy to have you.

Indeed you are locket, indeed you are.

Make the server all explore.

No need really you guys have made it quite easy. Now I get to watch you cry. Laf the best ALLIANCE in the history of the game beaten by a handful of countries. LOL.

You are quite the fool Locket(I assume this is the name you parents gave to you, as opposed to some fake internet name you invented to talk fluff on). Being a long time member to Laf provides you with no information other then you are aware of who I hit because members cry on your boards. Clueless as per usual.

Locket your hardcore bud!! Can't be bothered to answer you as we are both aware you have no information regarding the issues Laf face. Bluff all you like tough guy but I have never interacted with you before and are fully aware that you are clueless to the situation.

Spin it anyway you like Forgotten more players left the server during the LaF/SoF/RD heyday. You guys had great fun running people off and trolling the Hell out of them when they posted about it.

Shoes on the other foot for one reset and LAF turn into a pack of BELIEBERS!!

Who needs an alliance, when Laf would have you believe 1 country can destroy 50 countries working together in a coordinated effort!

The problem is Laf members want individual honors on a group server, you are not prepared to sacrifice your countries for your fellow alliance members. I didn't think it would be this easy but continue chasing those high NW and waiting for the admins to change the rules back so you can go back to comfortable manipulating a system you had worked out thoroughly.

Is that you grammie?

This Post Confirms:
1) You are resistant to change.
2) You are resistant to change.

Martian Mr.Forgotten said in his opening statement that the other top 5 players would leech and be FA'd. Cable is calling him out on that.

+1 grimjoww

It is not low defense if we look at this as a purely netting exercise, which it is not. This is a war based strategy game, people are able to attack. A handful of people out of 600 players were suicided on, relatively low numbers in the scheme of it.

What I'm trying to make as clear as possible is, I believe that you are trying to place too much emphasis on extremely high NW as a measure for success. Yes MrForgotten ran a country well from a purely netting view, in a keep my land and not make myself a target he did poorly. Should we turn off all attacks and make it a purely exploring based netting game. At least then it would be a level playing field and we will know that whoever wins is definitely the best because we have homogenized conditions .

Less then 1/6th of the player base has been affected, this is a minority.

He obviously did not have the most tanks. The griefer did, he was able to break afterall. Tella, this shows the stubborn refusal of Laf to change their playing habits. They could easily have more then 2.5mil tanks but they choose to chase artificially high NW as the benchmark of a good country/.Tella you net well you know the only way the can achieve the extremely high nw is to run with low costs and low def. At will Laf could have more then enough tanks.

Why should it? Unless you have the most Tanks on the server you should be vulnerable to every country on the server with more.

Tella, you know as well as I that the only reason the argument is ridiculous is due to the fact that Laf are appealing for people to feel sorry for them.This argument is a PR war to force admins to change the rules. Honestly unless tagged LaF why would anyone give a fluff?Laf has done anything/everything possible to win set after set. I'd be happy for my alliance that Laf were getting hit. Honest netters may have a chance this set. Laf need to grow up, is like a heavyweight boxer crying after being KO'd by a midget then whinging about being bullied.

Laf could do something about the suicider's they choose not to. You have 50+ members co-operating, make a 15 man kill squad an deal with it. Hell invite Cerb back to the game and have him start up Mercs Inc. Maybe Laf leadership should go grovelling back to Sof or actually carry some defense across the board and make it too expensive for your countries to be hit. Once again single countries do not have the resources to compete. Laf allow this to occur by insisting there is only one measure of winning the server and that is extremely high NW the only way to achieve that is to run low defense. You reap what you sow.

WOW, Look four possible solutions.

+1 SakitSaPuWit

RD were not revealed and they were an alliance full of cheats, bot runners etc etc. Yet, people are calling for people running single countries within the rules of the server to be revealed.

MrForgotten, honestly the whole whimpering from 50+ alliance members because of a handful is countries is WEAK. Your weren't so sorry or meek when you thought you had the backing of your alliance. Sucks when you get let down. We didn't do this to YOU, LaF did this too you. Don't like being attacked play in an alliance that can protect or will protect you, simple! Other then get more defense each of your countries has 12X Resources to use but you choose not too.

Too bad my objectives in this game are different to yours but that's the world for you. If having the highest NW is the goal of your alliance prevent other alliances from getting there. Such boring people. This may be the most interesting times in the last 15years. As all you old flufftards have to change the way you play. You forced us to change our style now we force you to change yours. Sucks Huh!

LaF have FA'd and tech leeched God knows how many people in too the top ten.

I'd be happy for the Admins to release details of "EVERYONE'S" country names associated to AT account what a joy that would be. While your at it, release all AT persona's as well. Lets start a real fluffstorm.

BS.

+1 SakitSaPuwit

If the griefers were to set up a tag "Grief" next set and suicide as a group but each target individual countries, people wouldn't be complaining as then they wouldn't be playing solo?

As you said "Almost Nothing".

The fact that a 50+ Alliance can't handle a griefer is kinda pathetic. Correct me if I'm wrong, ALLIANCES are formed to protect your country. If your ALLIANCE is not protecting your country might be time to move to one that can. Change your style of play morons, adapt. Nobody has offered a resolution other then "its not fair", ffs it is a game based on conflict!