Verified:

me

Member
60

Sep 4th 2011, 15:18:17

anoniem: are you on drugs?

me

Member
60

Aug 26th 2011, 10:15:27

the alliance I play for has a policy against hitting a country that has made a retal for 72 hours. If country c was in our alliance, the person running it could be facing a demotion. If country b was in our alliance, country c would either be paying reps or be retal'd for an RoR.

Now, that said, the Monsters are a peace loving alliance, and may have a policy of backing down. They also have a lot of friends, and there are 3 war prepped alliances (not counting Imag) that have yet to war.

Edited By: me on Aug 26th 2011, 10:38:09
See Original Post

me

Member
60

Aug 13th 2011, 10:51:10

Any war on this server with close numbers is going to be won by the side that:
1. Is war prepped with a war strategy peaking at the beginning of the war
2. Gets a surprise FS
3. Has the higher, more consistent activity level

evo vs sol = SOL
laf vs pdm = LaF (unless pdm is prepped and gets the FS)
sof vs md = the side that is better war prepped
lcn vs sanct = ditto
monsters vs na = monsters
omega vs imag = omega if they are at all war prepped. If they are set to net, Imag
tie vs rage = tie
fbi vs rd = the game mods
icn vs ksf = ICN

me

Member
60

Jan 15th 2011, 13:09:47

weeeeeee fan club ftw (:

me

Member
60

Jan 5th 2011, 4:11:59

handled.

me

Member
60

Dec 31st 2010, 21:40:01

JJ should play in the alliance game. Must be one out of the 14 alliances that would be willing to put up with him.

me

Member
60

Dec 31st 2010, 18:48:23

Originally posted by JJ23:
well i joined qzjul in evo.


http://forums.earthempires.com/...mp;z=best-netgaining-clan

me

Member
60

Dec 31st 2010, 18:37:29

mods: because this thread asks if JJ23 is still in Evo (as he claimed to joined at the beginning of the reset), it deals with alliance server issues and clearly deserves to remain on alliance talk. Please move it back.

Thank you.

me

Member
60

Dec 31st 2010, 15:38:06

Is he still in Evo?

me

Member
60

Dec 31st 2010, 1:03:05

Originally posted by Silent Sentinel:
1 vs 1.2 you mean LOL


Wouldn't have been "1 vs 1.2" if any Rager had bothered to try and wall or done a counter strike the first night. I guess walling is too much effort when you don't have to fight your own fights. Even one of your members walling would have been two or three more countries alive to fight.

But I guess it was easier to let your "big brother" handle your business, and finish the fight you instigated last reset. You're lucky SOL are such good allies - a less charitable ally would've waited another day for LCN to tag kill you before jumping in.

me

Member
60

Dec 29th 2010, 2:33:25

SOL declares war on LCN in defense of their ally, Rage.

Die.

That is all.

me

Member
60

Dec 28th 2010, 17:39:23

I have not messed with Rage in about 8 years.

And this looks like giving up, 20 hours in:

Rage LCNostra 115 0
LCNostra Rage 3164 14

me

Member
60

Dec 28th 2010, 15:11:00

Originally posted by Frisky:
i personally did ops on some of those suiciders, they had lcn allies mate.

i gave the info to my upper leadership. thats all i could do.



Your alliance is using War as a name theme. If those suiciders really had LCN as allies, Rage and Rage's allies would have hit LCN almost immediately.

Rage also said that Croatia suicided on Rage, when Croatia did not hit Rage until it was almost dead.

My guess is that the land kill suiciders got you guys paranoid, and when you found an untagged with LCN allies (Croatia), you killed it.

Originally posted by Frisky:

this entire grudge match could have been avoided. Granted the grudge is on LCN's side, Rage finds this funny.


Grudge matches in this game happen when one leaves unfinished business on the table. By choosing to wait until the last week of the set when LCN's countries were jumping and unable to afford to take the turns to fight back, Rage insured that there would be a rematch this reset.

Had Rage struck sooner last set, the war would have been fought out, and probably would have been a dead issue. LCN would have gone back to hugging trees. I guess that Rage was either unwilling or just plain lacked the guts to fight a 60 member alliance on their own. If I were a member of Rage, I would have to hope that LCN is not pissed off enough to keep this up for the next several resets.

Actions have consequences in this game, and anyone who says that the end of the reset wiped the slate clean in the "good old days" was not around in the "good old days." Rage made their bed, and now it is time for them to die in it.

When LCN used Ravi as their naming theme and as a tree hugging alliance came out with universal war strategies, Rage had to know what was coming. As an outside observer, I was able to predict that LCN would hit Rage this week based on their strategies, and I am not even bright enough to post under my real name.

From other posts on this board, it appears that Rage's allies used their big sticks to try and get LCN to not attack Rage, but Rage's shenanigans last reset pissed LCN off enough that they don't seem to care about getting gang banged, so long as they give Rage a little loving first.

From the lack of a Rage response, with almost half the tag dead at this point, it looks like Rage is just bending over and taking it. Tirol must be spinning in his keg.

It makes me sick that Rage is just sitting back and waiting for their allies to bail them out. Having fought along side Rage many times, it makes me sad to see a war alliance give up.

PS: Frisky: I recognize that you are a member of Rage, not a leader, and are doing your duty as a member of any alliance at war to spin things and define your side as "the good guys", so I have tried to remove my use of the personal pronoun, and water down my post as to not make it a personal attack. I apologize if I have failed - I do not mean to attack you personally.

me

Member
60

Dec 28th 2010, 4:05:25

Originally posted by Frisky:
to be fair we knew LCN wouldnt say bygones be bygones. they did encourage a suicider last set. and croatia is a common name by lcn that player does it all the time, same theo build set after set. strange how just after lcn encouraged a suicider to hit rage, the next set rage gets suicided on by a few more countries early set. say what you will but LCN looks pretty desperate in the need to avenge something of their own doing in the first place.


So by your lack of a denial, we can assume that Rage killed Croatia because of their country name?

Also, since Rage appears to be in the business of randomly killing untags (as evidenced by the kill of Fern Gully), is it any surprise that they'd get a few a countries land killed out of protection?

Also nice to see that Rage isn't even trying to resist LCN - just waiting for their allies to deal with the mess they created at the end of last set.

me

Member
60

Dec 28th 2010, 3:27:34

Originally posted by Frisky:
last set was because of a suicider that was even encouraged by their leadership, they were very very slow to prepare to "kill" the suicider. this set croatia suicided on rage and then tagged LCN, so naturally we killed him.... and they are the ones thats upset... interesting logic.


Croatia only hit Rage after they started killing it (and took quite a bit of land too). It then tagged up LCN late in the kill run.

Unless of course Croatia was doing harmful spy ops. But then again, Rage just killed Fern Gully for no reason, so maybe they recognized the name as belonging to a long time LCN member and decided to take advantage of its untagged status.

But what do I know, I'm just a troll.

me

Member
60

Dec 27th 2010, 23:29:31

Originally posted by Heston:
none of that was included in the original post........even if it was who is me really?


not sure, but RAGE is now RAG (1/4 of their tag is dead)

me

Member
60

Dec 27th 2010, 21:57:51

2010-12-27 21:20:20 CM Raviphobia (#278) RAGE WAR (#384) 70B 19 C
2010-12-27 21:14:27 GS Revenge of Ravi (#222) WARGASM (#438) 2C 7 F
2010-12-27 20:56:53 CM shirley ur missed (#463) Raising aWAReness for mens healt (#495) 29B 3 C
2010-12-27 20:55:51 GS Nice Creamy Ravioli (#429) Diego want WAR (#287) 4C 0 F
2010-12-27 20:51:21 GS Ravi ruined my top 5 finish (#291) GODz OF WAR (#488) 1C 1 F
2010-12-27 20:47:21 CM Perfect Country (#232) i81u812 (#2) 57B 22 C
2010-12-27 20:45:51 BR IM ur Huckleberry (#135) RAGE reWARds YOU (#170) 2B 10 C

seems pretty official

me

Member
60

Dec 27th 2010, 21:21:17

Die.

That is all.

me

Member
60

Dec 3rd 2010, 14:35:06

Originally posted by NukEvil:
Originally posted by BobbyATA:
...I also didn't like EVO having "friendly" relations with certain untaggeds. Thats why I left and severed ties. I'm drunk enough tonight to admit that heh..



Just because we don't LG certain untaggeds doesn't necessarily mean we're bring friendly with them. For example, if an untagged country is LGing other alliances and/or retalling hits made by other alliances on that country, don't you think that, to preserve your land and netting set, you may not want to hit that untagged country as well?

I believe it was the reset before last, that there was a group of players, playing untagged, and coordinating hits with each other, and I believe most of them ended with a pretty respectable networth. I believe someone even said something about them being suiciders (and I do believe they were put on suicide watch as well). Do you really think that we'd want to risk our netting set for a couple thousand free acres at the risk of having far more land taken back from us? Really?


The issue was the untags not hitting EvO, and not retaliating EvO's farming while aggressively going after the other tags that farmed them.

me

Member
60

Nov 21st 2010, 3:20:00

Originally posted by NukEvil:

mmm-hmmm....and I wasn't playing in Evo (or any other netting alliance) that reset. Your point?


Yet the all-jetters last reset top fed all of the alliances except for Evo. At the time the thinking was that Evo had sufficient defense (or at least what the leadership of Evo's pacts told their members to defuse the situation), but since you were running at least one of those all-jetters, it appears more like you were running those as an extension of Evo. The allies of Evo and pacted friends you top fed must not be happy at your revelations.

Was slagpit another Evo member running untagge all-jetter(s) (assuming this reset, since his all-x commie of last reset is public knowledge, and one would hope that a game admin was not running multis)?

Evo has had two (and soon to be three) consecutive ANW titles. I can not imagine your actions, and your incessant need to brag about those actions having a positive impact on Evo staying out of war to win a 4th.

me

Member
60

Nov 10th 2010, 13:09:21

so was PDM SoL's original target?

me

Member
60

Nov 8th 2010, 23:19:02

Warster, your best bet is to delete your above posts, this post, and walk away. Trolls are impervious to logic.

me

Member
60

Nov 4th 2010, 20:15:54

Three little LaF'ers
One went for the bonus turns
And all his people now reside in urns.
And then there were two

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:55:45

ooo basketball, weed parties, and a lot of things are your hobby! I didn't know that weed parties required a great deal of skill.

But then again, those child safety locks on lighters can be tricky.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:44:53

Originally posted by SMz:
you see thats the diffrence between us , I have a real life you know , I could hardly care what ppl think about me over the internet.


Then why are you here, instead of living that real life? And if you didn't care what "ppl think about me", you'd be ignoring the troll, not feeding it.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:40:44

so vent about it on SoF's site. Whining about it here just doesn't reflect well on you.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:31:27

Junky, would SOL have taken back a member who posted this mid set?

Originally posted by SMz:
decided to leave SoF =]

what allaince want a lazy with no time netter? ~_~


I know my alliance (which ain't fist), would not have.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:23:25

smz, this thread is making you look like a whiny little bi#%$ who can't handle a routine land grab. Your alliance has FA's who could've handled this easily. I'm not sure that SoF went into this reset looking to war an alliance 1/3 their size, and if this leads to war, you've probably derailed their plans.

And keeping your options open for the future publicly, mid reset, is not the sign of a loyal member. It was the sign of a wussy netgainer who found himself in a warring alliance and wanted to get out.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:15:54

you only try to publicly jump tags mid reset. which is a great indication of character.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:13:03

btw, aren't you the guy who publically tried to leave SoF a few days ago? Big talk to threaten someone with an alliance you want to leave.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:10:14

not sure how you top feed a country you have a 50% nw advantage on.

me

Member
60

Oct 24th 2010, 22:04:58

Looking at LaF's "FS", you have to wonder if LaF found out SOL was about to hit them and tried to get off a strike first. LaF had only 26 countries involved in their FS, or barely half of their of their 51 members. That does not seem like an alliance that has been planning a hit to fight a war on their terms. That sounds like someone who found out they were about to be ambushed again and hit back first.

SOL response looks like that of an alliance that had an FS planned to start a couple of hours later, and was on hand to return fire almost immediately. 3 of their 4 dead have already restarted, and their counter strike continues.

Only 1 of the 5 dead LaF'ers have restarted and tagged up. While they obviously had turns stored, if this was planned in advance, it is a poor showing for PDM, let alone LaF. If nothing else, LaF's poor performance leads to speculation that if they had waited a couple of hours, they would've been the hittees instead of the hitters.

Unfortunately for SOL, LaF's performance (hastily put together strike or just incompetence) means that this war will do nothing to enhance, or rehabilitate SOL's reputation as a fighting alliance. If SOL loses, well then it's a repudiation of their self image.

me

Member
60

Oct 10th 2010, 18:43:18

it sucks to have to ask this, but was frog/purple kicked out of RD for continuing to play under their non-RD alias, or for getting caught?

Far better to have caught this before the game mod, especially since RD knows who their colors are and maintain good contacts in the leadership of several alliances, including LaF.

Hell, since RD is going legit, but has the 600lb gorilla of their past actions to contend with, what's the downside of confirming with the other alliances that their members are not moonlighting?

me

Member
60

Oct 2nd 2010, 17:47:08

Originally posted by Marshal:
infernal council of nations+soldiers of fortune=nations of soldiers council.


SoF = Survival of the Fittest.

NOT:
Soldiers of Fortune,
Sons of the fluff
Sanctuary of Fifes
Swallowers of Fire
States of Freedom
Swines of February
Sins of Fettishism
Sacks of Flutes
Secretaries of Fingolfin
Sprigs of Flowers
Suppliers of Farmgoods
Secrets of Flimflam
etc.

me

Member
60

Sep 24th 2010, 22:30:26

1 problem with diffusing a missile boat and then farming them. You increase the effectiveness of their warfare tech and irate them. Now you have someone who gets a missile every 20-30 turns with a grudge.

me

Member
60

Sep 24th 2010, 22:24:57

That Elysium would have a higher TNW than LaF a week before the end of the reset.

me

Member
60

Sep 10th 2010, 18:06:17

so let me get this straight, AxA - SancT is a big bad warring alliance that gets revenge by letting someone soften up their target for 3 weeks and then jumping in?

I could see jumping in when SoF called in an ally, but to let ICN get good and tag killed first - that takes real cajones.

me

Member
60

Sep 3rd 2010, 15:11:53

Originally posted by Thomas:


I'm just not fond of Ivan because he's an idiot.


Originally posted by Thomas:

Hello pot, this kettle, ...

me

Member
60

Aug 18th 2010, 3:09:48

atleast until LaF educates a small alliance with the wrong pacts.

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 14:56:01

Aug 16/10 6:08:08 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 68 B
Aug 16/10 6:08:05 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 69 B
Aug 16/10 6:08:04 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 71 B
Aug 16/10 6:08:02 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 74 B
Aug 16/10 6:08:00 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 75 B
Aug 16/10 6:07:59 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 78 B
Aug 16/10 6:07:58 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 81 B
Aug 16/10 6:07:57 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 84 B
Aug 16/10 6:07:55 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 86 B
Aug 16/10 6:07:52 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 90 B
Aug 16/10 6:07:50 AM AB Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF) Elysium (#499) (ElySee) 92 B

Or is a dozen AB's acceptable under LaF's landgrab policy for "neutral" tags?

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 1:58:00

I'm not affiliated with PDM (:

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 1:49:07

Originally posted by SolidSnake:

...i could teach someone that had never played the game before in under an hour how to retal the best players on this server all reset long.


SS: even when every country in their tag was taking 7 hits every couple of days from your alliance?

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 1:29:25

Originally posted by H4xOr WaNgEr:
Those tags are not set on "will retal" otherwise they would be subject to the rule. They are on neutral. Guess why, because they don't retal effectively.


I would suggest that there aren't many alliances around right now that can effectively retal 34 hits in a 72 hour period.

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 1:14:41

if I were running LaF, I'd be setting up the kill runs now, because if I were running elysium, I'd be saving turns and buying tanks.

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 1:05:33

Originally posted by Son Goku:
It's the same way it's always been, how can people who have been around forever be so dense?


Hypocrisy gets annoying. If H4xOr had the stones to come out and say that Elysium is weak and LaF is strong, therefore allowing LaF to farm Elysium at will (atleast until they have to kill the 5 countries to preempt a suicide run), then there would be less of an issue. One might also think that an alliance that includes game admins in their membership might want to think about maintaining the illusion of fairness, if anything else to not further depopulate their product.

But I digress.

me

Member
60

Aug 16th 2010, 0:58:53

Originally posted by H4xOr WaNgEr:
We don't farm countries either.

a person is only allowed to attack an tag 2 times a day, on separate countries. Since when was single tapping countries "farming" ? Is that what you classify as "farming" when you say you don't farm in express or tourney? So you believe we should just all explore then I guess.


34 hits on the 5 elysee countries by LaF in the last 72 hours.

That includes the following violations of your stated policy:
Addiction is a terrible thing (#237) (LaF): 3 hits on one country in 24 hours, 5 in 48 hours. 7 total hits on that tag in the last 72 hours.
eatTorMINTicecreamUdai (#266) (LaF): 4 hits in the past 24 hours.
Currently Logged In (#253) (LaF): 6 hits on one country in the past 24 hours.
Lover not a Fighter (#501) (LaF): 4 hits on the Elysee tag on the 13th.
Boycotting Country Theme (#321) (LaF): Hit 3 of the 5 elysee tagged countries yesterday.

Other violations:
Scrub Paradise (#6) (LaF) has hit the xtx tag 5 times today.

It looks like you as a leader of your alliance are not effective at getting your members to follow alliance policies. It also looks like farming. Hopefully, for your alliance's sake, elysee doesn't have strong pacts.

me

Member
60

Aug 9th 2010, 23:30:25

to quote pearl jam,

I'm am I'm still alive, oh I am, I'm still alive, but do I deserve to be, is that the question, and if so, if so, who answers, who answers?

#107 ; p

me

Member
60

Aug 9th 2010, 22:19:13

hmm ... wonder what all those labs were doing on your land then ...

me

Member
60

Aug 9th 2010, 20:09:14

Originally posted by Dopplegangah:
Originally posted by me:
so tell me, Dopplegangah , who were you teching for?

A teammate or a multi?

It was a farmer, but you dropped your tech allies before you killed my wife's country.


haha, the only allies i've had were def and intel....nice try though! I attacked you (assuming you're 107) bc you overgrabbed me. Oh wait, I mean I killed you bc of that. DH was in a similar situation to me (you attacked him in an idiotic way - cant remember how, read the news), so I msg'ed him about it.


So what does a techer do with 25 points/acre of agritech and 12/acre of bus and res?