F***ing cracy whats happen in Game B. For one simple landgrab I get 48 attacks back. Is that normal?
Why can´t people retal in normal way.

You probably hit an all defense country...thats usually a no no in my book. Id do the same thing, exceot worse lol

I am doing that to a guy right now :) 1 attack = all my missiles and AB's until you are a parking lot. Can't let all those tanks rust away.

I like your thinking Rocker. Why inhibit technical superiority?

And as much as I appreciate the legacy of the landgrab, parties should remember it is an euphemism for invasion as my opponent in Game C is learning.

^ I like your reasoning.

I never understood why the special attack limitations on Express were not implemented here(GDI). 1 grab is not worth wrecking someone's set over. 9 times out of 10 you probably have no skill, couldn't retal and just threw a sissy fit :/

I feel for ya Img :(. Take it as a statement on your supperior skills :p

If you go post in the Bugs and Suggestions thread I will support your claim ;), I would do it but I post enough for those poor poor people to read.

SSS

Stop invading countries and you don't have to worry about retaliations (and I use this word not in EE terminology). If you want to be a conqueror, man up to the consequences. Why would I have 10 times as many missiles, if I can't use them (spare me the line of only retaliating w/ SS or PS). Wrecking somebody's set? You are playing a post-apocalyptic game about nation building.

If your strategy is to hit countries w/ missiles while you have no SDI or tanks while you have none, stop complaining about your opponents lack of skill, look at your own lack of strategy and the almost inevitable lack of diplomacy come the fall out of your consequences aka your opponent's sissy fit.

This is a quote from the nation currently at war w/ me...

"Grabbing land is a very natural part of this game. You could have taken a retal and grab land whenever you wanted. But you chose to use missiles, so here we go... "

Yeah, here we go. Opponent was sitting at 7th to my 21st. Now I am 23rd to his 26th. Ruined his set as a talentless sissy? No, ruining his set and happily so w/ superior strategy and a cut-throat attitude to the adoring cheers of my nation.

"If you make peace, we shall enjoy the rest of set together."

Like hell, you attacked me first, you exhibit some diplomacy make the peace. Instead crickets in the wind. Until the next artillery barrage on my end that is.

I applaud Rocker's mindset and thank p1co for supporting my reasoning above.

I play tourney because there are basically no rules. If I want to farm a smaller guy I can. If I get farmed...boohoo. If I want to save some missiles and knock down a top player on the last day that can be fun as well. It is enjoyable when the same happens to me.

My country is the same as my name here. If you see it say hi by sending a missile. Don't let the set end with a stockpile of nukes when they are there to have some fun with.

Great attitude, Rocker. People forget that we're here playing a game and games are supposed to be fun.

Darn. I forgot the set ended this soon. I had a missile stockpile. :(

Never again.

g

Tourney has no rules? So, its free for all?

No, yes it is!

Ko, your confusing me O_o

Happens...

It may not be named "Free for all" but Tourney is much less restricted by other players. Free For All has become "Follow the rules" or else... :) For independent free thinkers/asshats that attitude is not much fun to play in.

Rocker needs to join Chaos on FFA where rules fly out the window and countries turn red....

I won't go out of my way to ruin somones set over 1 grab.. what other people do with their time and their countries is completely on then :-P