Originally
posted by
euglaf:
There were no rep negotiations. Immediately after 335 started his suicide I told candy to talk to neo frs to end the nonsense. Neo frs ignored him and deliberately stated they wanted war
What's really stupid is that I would have agreed to pay reps. Perhaps not as much as neo would demand but we would have restored his country at the least (and perhaps more just to spite candy's stupidity). Considering laf has about 6 billion projected total networth it's not hard to assume we can pay.
Neo wants to break a unap without discussing anything and drag a war that's their call. All I'm really getting from this is that neo have unstable and irrational leaders.
ok first of all why would you send the person who started the conflict to resolve it? That is just you saying 'fluff you neo we will do what we want haha'.
second of all, and once again, laf broke the pact here, candy man's triple tap is a break of the pact, be it a grabbing pact or not, I have seen no grabbing pact that allows for triple taps.
Do not try to claim neo is breaking a pact here when your HFA has broken the pact.
Have you even punished Candy Man? surely when a HFA pulls this sort of stunt a demotion is automatic. (I know this would normally be an internal matter, you can try to claim that defence, but it will just prove to everyone that candymans actions were ordered by you, you are in a tough spot here because you are contridicting yourself. If you say you would of payed reps you need to start proving that by taking action against candy. otherwise its clear you wanted this to happen.)
Without doing so you are condoning his actions and condoning laf breaking the pact, if you truly wanted to resolve this like you keep claiming you would of, you would stop defending the actions of your 'stupid member' and start damning them.
I mean i want to be serious here Eugene, are you even in control of your alliance or is hanlong still in charge, i know he is playing there, be honest, is he the one realy making the decisions?