Originally
posted by
Flamey:
LOL @ backing PDM into a corner. Refusing to accept a pact, where the other party wouldn’t compromise and then doing topfeeds on countries using methods we don't like... is really vile bullying... Earth has never seen anyone put someone up against a wall like that before.
Then, oh wait, SoF is evil for planning how to deal with PDM after that said alliance threatened revenge and 'ways to get back' at us using the unconventional (or through our allies). SoF is evil for defensively preparing for potential oop war and then a week 2 at the latest, so that we can take them out quickly and be on standby for a potential gangbang.
Also, that Evo war was my idea and executed by me. I had plenty of grievances for it and one of them is that you talk big and hard on AT every time you have a NAP with us, then suddenly quiet down when it goes to re-pacting. As you are coming out mouth blazing again, I'm assuming you decided to war again next set as is the usual pattern of your flaming.
The war was poorly executed at a time SoF was at its weakest for a year. The strategy was wrong, we spent way too long in protection, unaware that everything had been leaked. We thought you might have suspicions, but not that it had actually been fully leaked (and yes I know how). The strategy battle was also an interesting one... ABed Commies vs Tyranies that were growing. The majority of our countries did not grow enough, but in the end it was number of hits coming from the Evo that was decisive; the 10 members we had lost from the prior set made it too a uphill task.
It was all humiliating. We could have asked LaF to enter to finish things off, but that would have been embarrassing also; the aid idea was to even it up a bit, but the problem was numbers and we would have eventually had to call LaF in anyway. This is why Evo asking for a cf out the blue wasn't too much of a surprise. We always had that card in our pocket and surprising enough Evo finally offered us a pact that removed the vast majority of our grievances (aka: two-stepping - fair defensive clause). But then again, everything else about that set was a political success:
We denied Evo the opportunity to hit LaF oop, which is what they really wanted to do (Against LaF's wishes - who wanted to take them on as well as SoL).
We got SoL in a position where they were isolated enough to end their coalition/aggressive policy against the server and Evo in a position where they had enough war for a good while and was willing to join in the long term talks.
We got revenge against TIE for the gangbang.
That could have been the end of a chapter, but we know how history goes. Those long term peace discussion were only genuine on one side. SoL/Evo were in another chat making new plans and the whole cf thing was a ruse to get SoF neutral during the next coalition. Evo ended that reset with 7 members and SoF finished that reset exacting revenge and on the up... I guess that must have happened because we are bullies ;) Though... if you want to see what we are really like when being bullies, then continue with your flaming and it can be arranged.
You planned the EVO war? Well, it was my plan to go all indies in case LaF or SoF FSed OOP, clever clogs. Who won the battle of the wits? The "fluff" netgainer or the war head from the most feared war alliance (I almost wet myself typing that)?
It being leaked? If I remember correctly every Evo country at the time had either 100 troops or 0, so you trying to play it off as if Evo had some divine intervention that saved up from your piss poor tactics then you're wrong. Our announcements were "Yellow Alert keep 40 turns on hand at times", yet you still couldn't beat us?
After switching to tyrannies we started to outgrow you, and then after demolishing almost every single one of your decent countries you ran off your master and begged for FA. A real valiant effort from a "war alliance". No idea why you're trying to say you wanted to "even" it up a bit. From what I hear the only reason KJ offered a CF pact with you guys is because you were having problems internally and we didn't want to drive away any of your members by continuing the war for the whole set.
Unlike you we have scruples. You may think I want to destroy SoF/LaF, but you're wrong. I don't want to destroy any alliance. I dislike your alliance's and everything you stand for, but I would never go out of my way to war a clan in the hopes of their membership dropping or "DEMORALISING" them. So everything I stand against is everything you stand for.
And, from what I remember. It was chevs offering me free land to keep me sweet, so that I wouldn't pact SOL. So, you tell me who has done the most grovelling or hushed up the most during pacting time? I don't remember offering SoF deals to keep you as uNAP allies. You've only ever served as being an unwelcome topfeeding annoyance to me.
Please, tell me why EVO then signed a UNAP with LaF? Even though we were apparently plotting our revenge? Please, tell me why we offered you a CF and signed a 1 year pact if we were secretly plotting to kill you off? Do you even understand what you're saying? It doesn't make a blind bit of sense.
Flamey if you're in-charge of the SoF war plan, then I'm sure every alliance in this game is just quaking at the boots.
Anyway, cheers for proving that you are indeed an arrogant bully. An arrogant bully who got beat down by a netting alliance even though you got the FS. LaF are practically carrying you.
P.S. ECM war - is another case of you not liking "fairer" encounters. You said that our side would get an advantage due to us being from 3 different alliances, and the fact that Monsters had never worked with EVO/SANCT before. Then you cry when you get beat and claim it was unfair due to our numerical advantage.
If you just come out with it and say: SoF don't like fair wars, because we can't win unless we blindside and have at least 1/3rd more members than you.
Falsehood is cowardice, the truth courage.
