Jun 17th 2013, 20:29:12
Originally posted by iScode:
of course they have an advantage. But unless you have the elite players just being smaller is not going to guarantee you a victory over an alliance like laf who have better systems, leadership and training in place.
Obviously this is the case which is why laf beats alliances like monsters, omega, ICN, Rival and so fourth when they net, but not evo.
Or do you not understand this?
It is like alliances back in the day like wog, met. they may not of been able to put out as many hits but hpm were far better than any alliances, and imo made them better war war alliances than sof now or IX back in the day, they were elite, which made them better at that facet of the game, but not better over all.
Obviously this is the case which is why laf beats alliances like monsters, omega, ICN, Rival and so fourth when they net, but not evo.
Or do you not understand this?
It is like alliances back in the day like wog, met. they may not of been able to put out as many hits but hpm were far better than any alliances, and imo made them better war war alliances than sof now or IX back in the day, they were elite, which made them better at that facet of the game, but not better over all.
Glad you can acknowledge it. But your first post didn't ;) You have a bias here.
Also LaF and Evo are on a different tier when it comes to netting compared to said alliance. You're comparing apples and oranges there.
I financially support this game; what do you do?