Originally
posted by
Trife:
why would this bother me at all? shirley you're not trying to say that this situation is anywhere close to the father assaulting and battering a child on the bus... nah you may be a redneck mouthbreather, but you can't be that stupid... right?
'Under the law in the state of Texas deadly force is authorized and justified in order to stop an aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault' - he didn't break any laws, so why on earth would he be charged with a crime?!
sounds to me like justice was carried out?
psst, sewageusmc, way to read the article, and even if the guy had shot the rapist i wouldn't have any problem with it since deadly force was justified and warranted. plus, you tards seem to forget that i'm pro-gun. you also forget that i'm also pro-gun control, and that seems to get your little pink panties into a twist, and that makes me smile. =)
Why would this bother me at all? Surely you're not trying to say that this situation is anywhere close to the father assaulting and battering a child on the bus... nah you may be a redneck mouth breather, but you can't be that stupid... right?
'Under the law in the state of Texas deadly force is authorized and justified in order to stop an aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault' - he didn't break any laws, so why on earth would he be charged with a crime?!
sounds to me like justice was carried out? Psst, sewageusmc, way to read the article, and even if the guy had shot the rapist i would not have any problem with it since deadly force was justified and warranted. Plus, you retards seem to forget that I'm pro-gun. You also forget that I'm also pro-gun control, and that seems to get your little pink panties into a twist, and that makes me smile. =)
Fixed your spelling and grammar errors for you grammar/spelling nazi.