Verified:

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Dec 21st 2012, 9:45:16


Edited By: Duna on Jan 10th 2013, 19:33:22
See Original Post

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Dec 21st 2012, 9:59:35

The second is a waste. Everyone knows the end of it and it doesn't worth a mention.

The first one is a good war!

ebola Game profile

Member
203

Dec 21st 2012, 10:02:50

Well, for now we can still see the nice FS by MD, but yeah, seems to be a foregone conclusion

ColoOutlaw

Member
475

Dec 21st 2012, 10:03:24

Ouch, no love?? I guess erbody knows MD stomps :)

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Dec 21st 2012, 10:06:34

Nope - everyone knows what the opposite side of MD is made off.

Brown material !!!

Murf Game profile

Member
1216

Dec 21st 2012, 10:32:55

Alin you really do get worked up so easily, join a tag and do something about it rather than whine on AT

I'm not bothering with this war at all, can't have it ruining my Xmas party season

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Dec 21st 2012, 11:58:01

I know you are among the few decent folks there. If the picture of this game looks ok for you than i have no other comment. Maybe that`s the reason you wanna net.

And of course you won`t bother with this war - as long as you aren't in MD skin.





Murf Game profile

Member
1216

Dec 21st 2012, 12:41:31

Nah I'm well aware of the state of this game, things will change eventually as every power block falls eventually

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Dec 21st 2012, 13:07:07

Yep, MD did nice FS:) Sadly it wont change anything.

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Dec 22nd 2012, 8:40:02

Same kills after 32h of war. Nice job MD:)

Bambam24 Game profile

Member
143

Dec 22nd 2012, 9:40:31

MD would have destroyed SOF 1v1... Where are MD's Allys????

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Dec 22nd 2012, 9:46:59

And if SoF had prepared for a Day 20 war with our 92 countries, experienced at this type of war, and attacked/had been attacked by MD, then we would have 'more than destroyed' MD... but this works too.

Bambam24 Game profile

Member
143

Dec 22nd 2012, 9:57:11

FLAMEY!!!! Old chum how is school

Fuji Game profile

Member
301

Dec 22nd 2012, 10:17:48

Originally posted by Flamey:
And if SoF had prepared for a Day 20 war with our 92 countries, experienced at this type of war, and attacked/had been attacked by MD, then we would have 'more than destroyed' MD... but this works too.


lmao

ColoOutlaw

Member
475

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:27:24

hahahahaha SoF you kidz are cute....

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:46:07

You guys have short memories, last reset a smaller SoF defeated MD ... AND... TIE, who were both warprepped, and knew of our FS time...

and I'm sure we'll get a chance to see how you stack up again in the near future.

tellarion Game profile

Member
3906

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:47:46

It would be more fair to say that you defeated Tie. And then, after you stored turns, you defeated MD.

ColoOutlaw

Member
475

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:52:42

hahahahaha

Edited By: ColoOutlaw on Dec 22nd 2012, 12:00:06
See Original Post

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:00:49

Yes, we destroyed 3/4 of TIE then hit MD, with no CMs. We were then fighting MD + 1/4 of the original TIE and the remianing 3/4 of TIE restarted and joined in the fight. Hence, we beat MD + 2100 (a day) extra finishing turns with ease, but we are somehow being told that SoF beating MD is unconceivable...

Then again the average MD member is so brainwashed by the propoganda fed to them insite, it doesn't really surprise me.

ColoOutlaw

Member
475

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:11:04

Who the hell here is MD??? I said you kidz are cute?!? IMHO you kids are. Do I have to be MD to say that??? Shaken baby syndrome is serious man... I just thought with all the crap going around I could support you guys...

d20 Game profile

Member
270

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:43:17

post...

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:55:07

beat my ass ...

When you Fs separately 2 half sized alliances of course you will win. You can destroy all the server if they all sit duck and wait for you to FS them every friday.

You can win wars only when you have a clear advantage. When the war is ballanced ( like 75 ws 92 with 75 having the FS ) you`ll call in up the other punks to make the numbers 2.4:1.

tellarion Game profile

Member
3906

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:12:24

Originally posted by Flamey:
Yes, we destroyed 3/4 of TIE then hit MD, with no CMs. We were then fighting MD + 1/4 of the original TIE and the remianing 3/4 of TIE restarted and joined in the fight. Hence, we beat MD + 2100 (a day) extra finishing turns with ease, but we are somehow being told that SoF beating MD is unconceivable...

Then again the average MD member is so brainwashed by the propoganda fed to them insite, it doesn't really surprise me.


What does this have to do with me? And so what if you didn't have CMs, you had 2 FS advantages...

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:27:18

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAA flamey keep digging yourself that hole!

sof couldn't beat an egg.
re(ally)tired

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:41:21

Originally posted by ColoOutlaw:
Who the hell here is MD??? I said you kidz are cute?!? IMHO you kids are. Do I have to be MD to say that??? Shaken baby syndrome is serious man... I just thought with all the crap going around I could support you guys...


There is a collection of MDers and members from butthurt mediocre alliances I'm addressing.

Originally posted by Alin:
beat my ass ...

When you Fs separately 2 half sized alliances of course you will win. You can destroy all the server if they all sit duck and wait for you to FS them every friday.

You can win wars only when you have a clear advantage. When the war is ballanced ( like 75 ws 92 with 75 having the FS ) you`ll call in up the other punks to make the numbers 2.4:1.



How is a 60 member MD and a 30 member TIE, two-half sized alliances?

Basically the reason we called in LaF (well actually SoF and LaF were both going to enter no matter how decent the strike was) was to ruin MD's warset. After seeing logs from MD's leadership laughing about ruining our netting reunion set, it seemed appropiate to salvage as much of it as we could, while destroying MD's set... an eye for eye.

Yes we could have fought 1vs1, but
1) That would require a lot of effort over christmas
2) We don't let other people dictate our warring schedule
3) See the above.

Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by Flamey:
Yes, we destroyed 3/4 of TIE then hit MD, with no CMs. We were then fighting MD + 1/4 of the original TIE and the remianing 3/4 of TIE restarted and joined in the fight. Hence, we beat MD + 2100 (a day) extra finishing turns with ease, but we are somehow being told that SoF beating MD is unconceivable...

Then again the average MD member is so brainwashed by the propoganda fed to them insite, it doesn't really surprise me.


What does this have to do with me? And so what if you didn't have CMs, you had 2 FS advantages...


I was just directly aswering your question.

Edited By: Flamey on Dec 22nd 2012, 13:43:40
See Original Post

Tempest

New Member
7

Dec 22nd 2012, 14:55:03

Oh but ofcourse you have logs!

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Dec 22nd 2012, 15:03:25

1.You politically isolated MD because they were the biggest alliance opposing you at this point.
2.MD offered an prearranged war to you - but you denied it. While Sol ws Sof prearranged was : us throwing in all what we had and you selecting the elite/ in this one, both MD and Sof had to choose therefore it was even - but you don`t like "even"
3.You denied MD anything - they wanted retribution against RD. DENIED. 1:1 war with you - DENIED.

Do you actually belive the other alliances in this game are your slaves ?

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Dec 23rd 2012, 9:29:50

Originally posted by Flamey:
Originally posted by ColoOutlaw:
Who the hell here is MD??? I said you kidz are cute?!? IMHO you kids are. Do I have to be MD to say that??? Shaken baby syndrome is serious man... I just thought with all the crap going around I could support you guys...


There is a collection of MDers and members from butthurt mediocre alliances I'm addressing.

Originally posted by Alin:
beat my ass ...

When you Fs separately 2 half sized alliances of course you will win. You can destroy all the server if they all sit duck and wait for you to FS them every friday.

You can win wars only when you have a clear advantage. When the war is ballanced ( like 75 ws 92 with 75 having the FS ) you`ll call in up the other punks to make the numbers 2.4:1.



How is a 60 member MD and a 30 member TIE, two-half sized alliances?

Basically the reason we called in LaF (well actually SoF and LaF were both going to enter no matter how decent the strike was) was to ruin MD's warset. After seeing logs from MD's leadership laughing about ruining our netting reunion set, it seemed appropiate to salvage as much of it as we could, while destroying MD's set... an eye for eye.

Yes we could have fought 1vs1, but
1) That would require a lot of effort over christmas
2) We don't let other people dictate our warring schedule
3) See the above.

Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by Flamey:
Yes, we destroyed 3/4 of TIE then hit MD, with no CMs. We were then fighting MD + 1/4 of the original TIE and the remianing 3/4 of TIE restarted and joined in the fight. Hence, we beat MD + 2100 (a day) extra finishing turns with ease, but we are somehow being told that SoF beating MD is unconceivable...

Then again the average MD member is so brainwashed by the propoganda fed to them insite, it doesn't really surprise me.


What does this have to do with me? And so what if you didn't have CMs, you had 2 FS advantages...


I was just directly aswering your question.


Lol @ butthurt mediocre alliances. What would that make SoF? Complete garbage by those standards.

- Mediocre alliances WOULD need LaF propping them up.
- Mediocre alliances WOULD have the arrogance to split into a netting and warring tag.
- Mediocre alliances WOULD gangbang other alliances.
- Mediocre alliances WOULD have people acquiring logs through shady means or "hanlong's google search bot" (which i may add seemed plausible in the eyes of sof and h4x0r dumb455)
- Mediocre alliances WOULD whine like little fluffes about a holiday season which has an affect on EVERYONE not just Sof and their (lack of) war skills.
to a tee.

POT. KETTLE. BLACK.
re(ally)tired

Mini Game profile

Member
122

Dec 23rd 2012, 9:39:15


"How is a 60 member MD and a 30 member TIE, two-half sized alliances?

Basically the reason we called in LaF (well actually SoF and LaF were both going to enter no matter how decent the strike was) was to ruin MD's warset. After seeing logs from MD's leadership laughing about ruining our netting reunion set, it seemed appropiate to salvage as much of it as we could, while destroying MD's set... an eye for eye.

Yes we could have fought 1vs1, but
1) That would require a lot of effort over christmas
2) We don't let other people dictate our warring schedule
3) See the above." - Flamey


Please Inform the community as to where, and how you got a hold of MD Logs mentioned.

Point 1# - Irrelevant. It's Holiday Season globally, and affects every clan. And needs to stop being referred to as it yields no benefit to either side.

your point No.# 2. Is How your Clan plays - Why should any other clan do differently.

Don't like the taste of your Own medicine? Neither does anyone else. :)

Im not trolling you Flamey (bar that last anecdote), i honestly would just to see the logs and how your clan came into getting them.


Edit: Apparently i typed the quote thing wrong. Nerts to my phone not utilizing the button.

Edited By: Mini on Dec 23rd 2012, 9:41:46
See Original Post

Mr Gainsboro Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1473

Dec 23rd 2012, 15:15:46

ttt for links
Don of LaF

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Dec 28th 2012, 8:52:02

Updated with LCN.

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Dec 31st 2012, 9:39:42

Added LaF vs Sanct

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Jan 10th 2013, 19:33:31

Akula Game profile

Member
EE Patron
4111

Jan 10th 2013, 19:44:26

=============================
"Astra inclinant, sed non obligant"

SOL http://sol.ghqnet.com/
=============================

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Jan 10th 2013, 20:16:49

Check my link;) It has SoL first also.
But i dont know, why you start it from 18:58

Akula Game profile

Member
EE Patron
4111

Jan 10th 2013, 20:37:54

to give a margin of error in case cLocks were out
=============================
"Astra inclinant, sed non obligant"

SOL http://sol.ghqnet.com/
=============================

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Jan 11th 2013, 8:51:08

Heh:) Your link showes 2 more hits from SoL. They are probably exactly at 19:00:00 and EG uses > instead of >= in time:)))
Seems funny for me;)
GJ SoL with timing:)

Kumander Otbol

Member
728

Jan 11th 2013, 12:28:18

i blame Duna. :P
Originally posted by cypress:
no reason to start slacking just because they are getting FA

fluff them....we'll steamroll them even with the FA they are getting

iTarl Game profile

Member
879

Jan 11th 2013, 17:41:17

b

macmd Game profile

Member
158

Jan 12th 2013, 19:35:19

SoL is looking good.

mider Game profile

Member
68

Jan 12th 2013, 20:59:34

die laf

Pride Game profile

Member
1590

Jan 13th 2013, 2:17:09

Looking really fun.

CYBERMOUSE Game profile

New Member
11

Jan 18th 2013, 19:17:30

ttt